Minimum Retention Policies for Teams and Exchange Locations

Implement and manage retention

Answer Correct answer: B — 2 retention policies are required because Teams chats and Teams channel messages must be separated from Exchange, SharePoint, and Microsoft 365 Groups locations.

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription. You need to create static retention policies for the following locations: Teams chats Exchange email SharePoint sites Microsoft 365 Groups Teams channel messages What is the minimum number of retention policies required?

1
2 Correct Answer
3
4
5

Community Insight

Tests the constraint that Teams chats and Teams channel messages are distinct retention locations that cannot be combined with Exchange, SharePoint, or M365 Groups in a single policy.

Determines the minimum number of static retention policies required to cover Teams chats, channel messages, Exchange email, SharePoint sites, and M365 Groups. Establishes that Teams content must be separated from other workloads.

Learners often choose 1 policy, assuming Microsoft 365 allows combining all supported locations into a single retention scope, ignoring the specific isolation rules for Teams messaging.

Community Discussion (14 comments)

Ariasjose 👍 1 Selected: B

Answer: B. 2 You need two retention policies: Teams policy: Teams chats + Teams channel messages Microsoft 365 policy: Exchange email + SharePoint sites + Microsoft 365 Groups Why: Teams retention locations must be managed separately from the other Microsoft 365 workloads.

JamesM9 👍 1 Selected: B

I have just tested this in my tenancy and can confirm that you cannot include Teams Channel messages in the same policy as SharePoint, OneDrive etc. So therefore, the answer here is B - 2 policies.

SSL2 👍 1 Selected: B

B. 2 You need two static retention policies: One policy for the non-Teams locations: Exchange email SharePoint sites Microsoft 365 Groups One policy for the Teams locations: Teams chats Teams channel messages Microsoft says a single retention policy can’t include all supported locations and that if you select Teams locations, the other locations are automatically excluded. It also shows that for a static policy you can select one or more Teams locations, including Teams channel messages and Teams chats, in the same Teams policy.

Blabla532 👍 1 Selected: C

3 required, u cannot create a single Purview retention policy that covers all Teams chats (1:1, group chats) and all channel messages (standard, private, shared) simultaneously; you need separate policies for different Teams locations like "Teams chats" (private/group) and "Teams channel messages,"

Eltooth 👍 2 Selected: B

B is correct answer: 2 retention policies.

Eltooth 👍 2

NOTE: If you see Teams Private channel messages - they are also stand alone. In Purview you now will see this message: "Messages from Teams private channels. (NOTE: Will be deprecated by Oct 2025. Please use Teams channel messages policy for Private channels.) "

Gtc_ 👍 1 Selected: C

3 policies. Teams Chat, Teams Channel, All others

ivzdf 👍 2 Selected: B

Although a retention policy can support multiple services that are identified as "locations" in the retention policy, you can't create a single retention policy that includes all the supported locations: Exchange mailboxes SharePoint sites or SharePoint classic and communication sites OneDrive accounts Microsoft 365 Group mailboxes & sites Skype for Business Exchange public folders Teams channel messages Teams chats Teams private channel messages Microsoft Copilot experiences Enterprise AI apps Other AI apps Viva Engage community messages Viva Engage user messages If you select the Teams or Viva Engage locations when you create a retention policy, the other locations are automatically excluded. This means that the instructions to follow depend on whether you need to include the Teams or Viva Engage locations.https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/create-retention-policies?view=o365-worldwide&tabs=teams-retention

tila_s 👍 9 Selected: C

Policy 1 – for Teams chats Policy 2 – for Teams channel messages Policy 3 – combined for: Exchange mailboxes SharePoint sites Microsoft 365 Groups

10319ae 👍 3 Selected: C

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the answer from Copilot It’s a clever thought—but no, you can’t reduce it to just two retention policies if you want to cover all five locations with static scopes. 📌 Why You Need Three - Teams chats and Teams channel messages are treated as separate workloads in Microsoft Purview. Each requires its own retention policy. - Exchange email, SharePoint sites, and Microsoft 365 Groups can be bundled into a single policy. So even with the most efficient configuration, you still need: - One policy for Teams chats - One policy for Teams channel messages - One policy for Exchange, SharePoint, and Microsoft 365 Groups

7259dc7 👍 2 Selected: A

You can now have a single retention policy for Sharepoint, Onedrive, Exchange, 365 groups and Teams stuff

DiegoWill 👍 16 Selected: B

Only 2 policies are needed because it is not possible to contain team chats and channels together with the other workloads (Exchange, SPO and M365 groups).

Scrambles 👍 1

You are correct, B is the right answer. Here is Microsoft documentation on being able to combine both Teams chat and Teams channel messages in the same static retention policy: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/create-retention-policies?tabs=teams-retention

papillor 👍 2

I'd tend to agree with 2 policies too, but if you go on Purview, on the retention policy creation section, there's no more "Teams chats" nor "Teams channel messages".

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

The correct answer is B (2). In Microsoft Purview, you can combine Exchange mailboxes, SharePoint sites, OneDrive accounts, and Microsoft 365 Group mailboxes/sites into a single retention policy. However, Teams content is treated differently: 'Teams chats' and 'Teams channel messages' are separate workload locations that cannot be included in the same policy as Exchange/SharePoint/M365 Groups. Therefore, you need one policy for the 'Teams chats' location and a second policy that covers 'Teams channel messages' along with the other three workloads (Exchange, SharePoint, M365 Groups). Wait, actually, let's re-verify the grouping.

Correction: 'Teams chats' (private) and 'Teams channel messages' are indeed separate locations. Can they be in the same policy? No, historically they were separate. But can 'Teams channel messages' be grouped with Exchange/SharePoint? Yes. And 'Teams chats' must be alone? Or can 'Teams chats' be grouped with anything?

Let's look at the official documentation structure. Policy 1: Teams chats. Policy 2: Teams channel messages, Exchange mailboxes, SharePoint sites, M365 Groups. This totals 2 policies. Alternatively, if Teams chats and Teams channel messages cannot be mixed with others, but CAN they be mixed with each other? No, they are distinct locations. So Policy 1 = Teams Chats. Policy 2 = Teams Channel Messages + Exchange + SharePoint + M365 Groups. This is valid. So the minimum is 2.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A (1) is incorrect because you cannot create a single policy that includes both Teams chats/channel messages AND Exchange/SharePoint due to workload separation constraints. Option C (3) would be the count if Teams chats, Teams channel messages, and the rest were all forced into separate policies, but Teams channel messages can share a policy with Exchange/SharePoint/M365 Groups. Options D and E are unnecessarily high.

Community Comment Notes

Several users correctly identified the answer as B, noting that Teams content must be managed separately from Exchange and SharePoint. As user DiegoWill noted, "Only 2 policies are needed because it is not possible to contain team chats and channels together with the other workloads." User JamesM9 confirmed via testing that "you cannot include Teams Channel messages in the same policy as SharePoint... So therefore, the answer here is B - 2 policies."

Exam Strategy

Remember the 'Teams vs. Non-Teams' split. Any retention policy covering Teams chats or channel messages cannot also cover Exchange, SharePoint, or OneDrive. You must always account for this separation when counting minimum policies.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why can't I put all locations in one retention policy?

Microsoft Purview restricts mixing Teams messaging locations (chats/channels) with productivity locations (Exchange/SharePoint) in a single static retention policy.

Can Teams channel messages be combined with SharePoint sites?

Yes, Teams channel messages can be included in the same retention policy as Exchange mailboxes, SharePoint sites, and Microsoft 365 Groups.

More SC-401 FAQ →

Related Analysis

← Back to SC-401 Study Guide