Endpoint DLP Service Domains for Two Contoso Sites

Implement and monitor Microsoft Purview Endpoint DLP Create and configure data loss prevention policies
Answer Correct answer: C — Set the Endpoint DLP Service domains list to web1.contoso.com and web2.contoso.com so only the two named upload destinations are blocked.

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription. You need to prevent users from uploading data loss prevention (DLP)-protected documents to the following third-party websites: web1.contoso.com web2.contoso.com The solution must minimize administrative effort. To what should you set the Service domains setting for Endpoint DLP?

  1. *.contoso.com
  2. contoso.com
  3. web1.contoso.com and web2.contoso.com Correct Answer
  4. web*.contoso.com

Community Insight

The question tests exact service-domain targeting versus wildcard convenience; the trap is assuming a partial wildcard such as web*.contoso.com is accepted by Endpoint DLP.

This SC-401 scenario tests how Endpoint DLP service domains are scoped for two specific contoso.com upload sites. The answer is C: list web1.contoso.com and web2.contoso.com explicitly, because a broad .contoso.com wildcard would over-block and web.contoso.com is not a supported domain pattern.

The most common wrong answer is A (*.contoso.com), because it looks like a single-entry, low-effort wildcard, but it also blocks every other contoso.com subdomain and can create later cleanup effort.

Community Discussion (8 comments)

kollyp2000 👍 1 Selected: A
What the question requires: Block uploads to web1.contoso.com and web2.contoso.com. “The solution must minimize administrative effort.” What it doesn’t say: “only” those two sites, or “other contoso.com sites must stay reachable.” Nothing forbids also covering other subdomains.
Eltooth 👍 2 Selected: C
I agree with C - least admin effort and does not block wildcard child domains of contoso.com.
4d76265 👍 6 Selected: C
D is not possible in Purview. A is possible but you would be blocking more than intended so you could spend more time allowing other subdomains. C seems best fit for least admin effort.
58d4802 👍 2 Selected: C
I agree with option C because it is specifically targeting the two mentioned websites , nothing more nothing less
PsiCzar 👍 4 Selected: C
I'm unable to add web.contoso.com to the list of service domains in the Endpoint DLP settings of my dev environment. I can type it in, click the + and click Save but it doesnt appear in the list, and I tried multiple times. I am able to add all other domain examples in the answers, but I suspect the correct answer is D, because .contoso.com and contoso.com are pretty broad answers and would block anything on that domain so would be overkill.
Linpus 👍 2 Selected: D
This will match both web1.contoso.com and web2.contoso.com in one rule.
Jol 👍 1
I agree!
papillor 👍 3
I would agree with you, it saves us time when creating but I'd wager they are playing with the "overreaching" factor. Maybe web3.contoso.com is a supported website for upload documents and it would add administrative effort to correct the initial policy. The correct answer is C

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

Option C sets the Endpoint DLP Service domains list to exactly web1.contoso.com and web2.contoso.com, which matches the two named upload destinations while preserving other contoso.com subdomains. Endpoint DLP service domains are matched as domain entries, so C is the only option that blocks DLP-protected document uploads to those two third-party sites without over-scoping. Adding two explicit entries is still a small, one-time administrative action and avoids later remediation if another contoso.com subdomain must remain reachable. The minimize-administrative-effort requirement is satisfied by the precise list rather than by a broader rule that would need exceptions.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A (.contoso.com) matches web1 and web2 but also every other subdomain under contoso.com, which goes beyond the stated third-party sites and can create more administrative effort to exempt legitimate services. Option B (contoso.com) is the parent domain and does not reliably match the two subdomains, so uploads to web1.contoso.com or web2.contoso.com could remain allowed. Option D (web.contoso.com) requires a partial-label wildcard; Endpoint DLP's service-domain entry does not accept that pattern, as PsiCzar observed when the value would not persist after saving. Without a supported partial wildcard, C is the only valid exact configuration.

Community Comment Notes

The community mostly converged on C for the same scoping reason: as 4d76265 noted, .contoso.com is possible but would block more than intended, and 58d4802 emphasized that C targets exactly the two mentioned websites and nothing else. PsiCzar's testing point is the key technical evidence against D: web.contoso.com could be typed but did not remain in the service-domain list after saving. kollyp2000 argued for A on the theory that the question does not say only those two sites, but that reading ignores the over-blocking risk and the fact that C is still a very small administrative task. Eltooth and papillor likewise favored C because it avoids wildcard child-domain overreach.

Official Reference

Exam Strategy

Eliminate unsupported wildcard forms first, then compare the remaining exact and broad domain entries against the stated sites; broad matching is not minimal if it forces later exceptions. In Endpoint DLP questions, prefer the narrowest service-domain list that still covers every named destination.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why isn't *.contoso.com the best choice for Endpoint DLP service domains?

It covers web1 and web2 but also every other contoso.com subdomain, so it over-blocks and may require later cleanup if other sites must stay reachable.

Can web*.contoso.com be used in the Endpoint DLP service domains list?

No. Microsoft Purview's service-domain entry does not accept a partial-label wildcard in that position, so the pattern will not persist as a valid entry.

More SC-401 FAQ →

Related Analysis

← Back to SC-401 Study Guide