Fixing undefined values in a DirectQuery model by normalizing casing in the source query
Short answer
A Yes, normalizing casing in the source query or Power Query Editor is the documented fix for undefined values from case-sensitive DirectQuery sources.
Question
Key Takeaways
The Power BI engine is case-insensitive, so a case-sensitive source feeding DirectQuery can collide duplicate-looking rows into undefined values — normalizing the casing in the source query or Power Query is one of the two remedies the official data types note prescribes.
A case-sensitive column produces undefined values and errors when consumed by a case-insensitive DirectQuery semantic model, and the proposed fix is to normalize casing in the source query or Power Query Editor.
Common mistake: Believing casing normalization is unrelated to 'undefined values' — the official note ties undefined values and errors in DirectQuery directly to case-sensitive data from the source, and casing normalization is a documented cure.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The goal states the DirectQuery model contains undefined values and errors caused by case-sensitive source data. Microsoft's data types documentation explicitly notes that because the Power BI engine stores and queries data case-insensitively, case-sensitive values from a DirectQuery source can surface as undefined values, and it lists normalizing the casing in the source query or in Power Query Editor as a way to resolve the issue. The proposed solution is therefore a documented remedy that meets the goal.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
The only alternative answer would claim the solution does not meet the goal, but that contradicts the official note: no other change is required for the casing problem itself, and the solution name-drops exactly the two locations (source query or Power Query Editor) the documentation recommends. Option B would only be defensible if the solution had proposed an unrelated fix such as changing column data types or removing column profiling.
Community Comment Notes
A commenter with several endorsements links the official desktop data types page and directs readers to the note near the bottom of it, which supports Yes. Dissenting comments argue that undefined values require checking column quality and profiling instead, but those steps diagnose the problem rather than fix it, and the question asks whether the stated solution resolves it.
Official Reference
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/connect-data/desktop-data-types
This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
When a DirectQuery model shows undefined values because the source column is case sensitive, look for whether the proposed fix normalizes casing in the source query or Power Query Editor; that exact phrase is the documented remedy. Do not pick an answer based on column quality or profiling steps, since those diagnose the issue rather than resolve the casing mismatch. If the solution instead changes data types or removes profiling, treat it as wrong for this goal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why do case-sensitive source values cause undefined values in a DirectQuery Power BI model?
Does normalizing casing in the source query or Power Query Editor meet the goal?
Why is option B incorrect for this PL-300 DirectQuery question?
Community Votes
79% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 11 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 11
-
f3ecb98 👍 4 Answered AThis exact scenario is explained in the docs (at the "Case sensitivity" part): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/connect-data/desktop-data-types. According to Microsoft, normalize casing in the source query should be the solution.
-
Srilatha_B 👍 4 Answered Ahttps://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/connect-data/desktop-data-types See Note as you scroll down
-
jaume 👍 3In Q36 I voted "No" answer as converting values to required types maybe could fix some unidentified values but I don't think that would fix the errors. Now, although information in the link shared by f3ecb98 and fgo states details bout case sensitivity difference in the PBI engine and PBI tool, I should keep opinion normalize casing could fix some undefined values but don't think this could fix the errors so my vote is for the second option B.No
-
dpkamalarani 👍 3Answer is no, direct query mode cannot be edited in power query
-
VladStan 👍 2The questions says "OR": So, either "Power Query Editor" (which is IMO wrong due to Direct Query mode) OR "You normalize casing in the source query" (which is true, again IMO) I would say that the answer is "A - Yes"
Show 6 more comments
-
Garrison 👍 2 Answered AWhy is every question so convoluted lol, theres like 3 total questions in this thing that everyone agrees on
-
aa83599 👍 2 Answered B'Undefined Values' cannot be fixed by adjusting casing
-
fgo 👍 1For me Answer is NO I didn't see how "normalize casing in the source query or Power Query Editor" can address the issue of undefined values and errors in the model ?
-
SylUK 👍 1 Answered AA is the answer because the main objective of normalization, is to eliminate redundancy, minimize data modification errors and simplify the query process.
-
BhavnishM 👍 1 Answered BYou need to check the column quality, column profile to solve the issue. Changing the CASE will not resolve undefined errors.
-
hy00 👍 1I think the given answer is correct
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All PL-300 Questions
Access 116 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full PL-300 Practice Test →