Implicit type conversion cannot fix case-sensitivity errors in DirectQuery
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a data source that contains a column. The column contains case sensitive data. You have a Power BI semantic model in DirectQuery mode. You connect to the model and discover that it contains undefined values and errors. You need to resolve the issue. Solution: You implicitly convert the values into the required type. Does this meet the goal?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The undefined values stem from the case-insensitive Power BI engine colliding rows from a case-sensitive source — a type conversion changes storage representation, not string casing, so the collisions remain.
Continuing the case-sensitive DirectQuery scenario, the proposed solution implicitly converts the values into the required type to resolve undefined values and errors.
Believing a data type change will clean errors — the errors and undefined values exist because of casing collisions, and converting type on already-failed values cannot restore the original distinctions the engine flattened.
Community Discussion (6 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The documented cause of this scenario's undefined values and errors is the mismatch between the case-sensitive source column and the case-insensitive Power BI engine in DirectQuery mode. Implicitly converting values to another type does not change the casing of any string, so the engine still sees colliding values and still produces undefined results. The solution therefore does not meet the goal.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Answering Yes would require implicit conversion to alter case behavior, which no type conversion does — text remains text with identical casing regardless of storage type. The official remedies for this scenario remain casing normalization or adding an index key; type conversion appears in neither, and commenters add that conversions attempted on error values typically fail or propagate the errors further.Community Comment Notes
The vote is unanimous for No, with commenters noting that implicit conversion does not address case sensitivity and that errors must be corrected at the data level first. The consistent reasoning matches the documented cause of the problem.Official Reference
Related Analysis
Practice All PL-300 Questions
Access 116 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full PL-300 Practice Test →