Which Two Processes for Combined Purchase Receipts in Business Central?
Short answer
BC Train users to delete fully invoiced POs after combining receipts into one vendor invoice and to create purchase credit memos for returns or damages.
Question
Key Takeaways
The question tests your ability to map the case's purchasing requirements onto the exact Business Central processes — combining receipts leaves each PO fully invoiced, and reverting a posted vendor invoice for damages or a return needs a purchase credit memo — while the trap is borrowing the sales-order recurring-lines requirement and turning it into a purchase process.
This MB-800 case-study question asks which two Business Central processes users must be trained on when multiple purchase receipts are combined into one vendor invoice. It establishes that deleting fully invoiced POs (B) and creating a purchase credit memo (C) are the two related processes the scenario requires.
Common mistake: The most common wrong pick is A (Create recurring purchase lines), because the case mentions recurring lines; however, that requirement explicitly applies to sales orders, so training users on recurring purchase lines satisfies no stated requirement.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The case requires that multiple purchase receipts be combined into one vendor invoice and that posted vendor invoices be reverted when damages are reported or goods are returned to the vendor. When several POs are consolidated into a single vendor invoice, every one of those POs ends up fully invoiced, so users must know how the system removes/delete POs that are fully invoiced so they stop appearing on the PO list page — exactly option B. For the reversal requirement, the supported Business Central process is to create a purchase credit memo against the posted vendor invoice, which reverses the purchase cost and the payable and can reference the goods returned to the vendor — option C. Both processes belong to the same combined-receipt-to-one-invoice flow, which is why the question calls them "related" processes to include in the training.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
A (Create recurring purchase lines) is the classic distractor: the case states that recurring lines must be offered on sales orders ("ask the user if recurring lines should be added to sales orders"), so a recurring purchase line process answers a requirement the scenario never makes. D (Correct or cancel unpaid purchase invoices) addresses unpaid posted invoices used to fix a document before settlement, whereas the case is about reverting posted vendor invoices caused by damages or a return to the vendor, which is the purchase credit memo path. In addition, D largely duplicates C instead of covering the second, distinct process the combined-receipt scenario needs, and neither C nor D alone handles the fully invoiced PO list requirement.
Community Comment Notes
python123 argued that "A and B are out of box functions, don't need train the user" and leaned toward C and D, but every process named here is a standard Business Central capability, so being "out of the box" does not disqualify B or C from the training list. 73e77dc selected A and B yet justified B with the observation that "in combined shipments PO are left open in the system and must be deleted afterwards", which is precisely the PO list page requirement behind option B. Another learner simply posted "Answer is BC", while f5b341e asked "Why not AC?", illustrating how easily candidates swap the sales-order recurring-lines requirement into the purchasing scenario.
Official Reference
- https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/business-central/purchasing-how-process-purchase-returns-cancellations
- https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/business-central/purchasing-how-correct-cancel-unpaid-purchase-invoices
These links open the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
In MB-800 case studies, re-read the requirement bullets and match each option literally to one bullet before selecting; here only the "fully invoiced POs must not appear on the PO list" rule and the "posted vendor invoices must be reverted" rule map to real processes. Beware of options that swap document types (purchase versus sales) or that fix unpaid documents when the scenario is about posted ones.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is creating recurring purchase lines (A) not a valid training process here?
Why is correct or cancel unpaid purchase invoices (D) wrong for this scenario?
Community Votes
67% of anonymous learners picked answer BC. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 4 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 4
-
python123 👍 2C and D A and B are out of box functions, don't need train the user.
-
73e77dc 👍 1A because the scenario states that often recurrent items are used B because in combined shipments PO are left open in the system and must be deleted afterwards
-
70e8a4b 👍 2Answer is BC
-
f5b341e 👍 1Why not AC?
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.