Who Receives a Vulnerability Scan Report?
Which of the following stakeholders are most likely to receive a vulnerability scan report? (Choose two.)
Community Insight
The question tests audience matching for vulnerability management reporting; the common trap is selecting product owner because it sounds like the party responsible for affected systems.
Vulnerability scan reporting must reach both the leaders who own risk and the administrators who remediate it. This page establishes executive management and systems administration as the CySA+ answer pair.
Learners pick E (Product owner) because they assume the person who owns the affected product must receive scan findings, but CySA+ pairs executive management with systems administration instead.
Community Discussion (17 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The question asks who is most likely to receive a vulnerability scan report, and CySA+ objective 4.1 treats vulnerability reporting as a communication flow between governance and operations. Executive management (A) receives the summarized risk posture so it can fund remediation and track organizational exposure; systems administration (F) receives the detailed findings because it performs patching, hardening, and verification. CompTIA's study material lists executives, managers, IT staff, and external partners as the audience for vulnerability information, which places A and F squarely in the expected pair. Several commenters reached the same conclusion, including SH_ with "Exec management and Sys Admins. AF." and Omo_Mushin, who ties executive management to overall security posture and systems administration to remediation.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Product owner (E) is the strongest distractor because it sounds like the person accountable for an affected system, but CySA+ uses system owners and IT staff rather than product owners as standard report recipients; maggie22 notes that only the "product owner" is absent from the book's stakeholder categories. Law enforcement (B) enters after a criminal incident, not during routine vulnerability scan reporting. Marketing (C) has no role in vulnerability remediation or risk governance. Legal (D) may handle breach notification and contractual exposure, but legal is not a normal recipient of raw vulnerability scan output.Community Comment Notes
The comments split between AF and EF, and that split is the exact trap the question sets. jspecht argues that "Executive management doesn't need to see the vulnerability scan report itself," but the counterpoint is that executives receive the summarized report rather than the raw scanner export. ID77 cites page 426 of Chapple's CompTIA study guide for AF, and maggie22 points to CySA-003 Chapter 12 and the book's stakeholder list. Justheretolook and e09294d favor EF, but their reasoning substitutes product owner for the standard system-owner and IT-administration audience; voiddraco's question about whether systems administration is a stakeholder is answered by the remediation role itself.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
For stakeholder questions, split the audience into governance and operations: executives get summaries, technicians get details, and legal or law enforcement appear only after incidents. Eliminate marketing and product owner as non-standard roles, then select executive management and systems administration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is product owner (E) not one of the two vulnerability scan report recipients?
CySA+ names executives, managers, IT staff, and external partners as report audiences, not product owners; product owners are a business role, while administrators handle remediation.
Why do executive management and systems administration both receive the report?
Executives need the summarized risk posture to prioritize funding, while systems administration needs detailed findings to patch and reconfigure affected systems.