Resolve Sales Research Agent Competitive Intelligence Brief Issue
Case Study
This is a case study. Case studies are not timed separately from other exam sections. You can use as much exam time as you would like to complete each case study. However, there might be additional case studies or other exam sections. Manage your time to ensure that you can complete all the exam sections in the time provided. Pay attention to the Exam Progress at the top of the screen so you have sufficient time to complete any exam sections that follow this case study.
To answer the case study questions, you will need to reference information that is provided in the case. Case studies and associated questions might contain exhibits or other resources that provide more information about the scenario described in the case. Information provided in an individual question does not apply to the other questions in the case study.
A Review Screen will appear at the end of this case study. From the Review Screen, you can review and change your answers before you move to the next exam section. After you leave this case study, you will NOT be able to return to it.
To start the case study
To display the first question in this case study, select the “Next” button. To the left of the question, a menu provides links to information such as business requirements, the existing environment, and problem statements. Please read through all this information before answering any questions. When you are ready to answer a question, select the “Question” button to return to the question.
Background
Contoso Ltd. is a global technology distributor headquartered in Redmond, Washington and has enterprise customers across North America and Europe.
Contoso Ltd. currently manages its sales operations by using Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales and plans to enable Sales Insights in the future.
The company has approximately 150 field sellers, 40 insider sellers, 20 sales managers, and a central IT team responsible for configuring the sales platform. Contoso Ltd.’s executive leadership has defined the following goals for the new sales platform implementation:
Improve seller productivity by reducing manual research and data entry.
Use AI insights to prioritize leads and opportunities.
Provide automated recommendations to sales representatives throughout the deal lifecycle.
Current environment
Sales platform
Contoso Ltd. uses Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales integrated with Microsoft 365 services. The following components are currently deployed:
Business requirements
Contoso Ltd.’s executives have defined the following business requirements:
Lead management
Inside sellers must use a seller engagement workspace that prioritizes leads automatically based on predicted likelihood to convert.
All sellers are guided through a consistent set of qualification steps aligned to Contoso Ltd.’s sales strategy.
Leads cannot be advanced to the development stage until a decision maker has been confirmed.
Sales leadership requires flexibility in how leads are converted. Inside sales need automatic opportunity creation. Field sellers need the option to manually decide whether an opportunity should be created when a lead is qualified.
Lead scoring must be implemented to help sellers identify high potential leads automatically.
Lead scoring must continuously improve based on historical sales outcomes.
Opportunity development
Opportunities are tracked in Dynamics 365 Sales through a defined qualification-to-opportunity lifecycle to ensure accurate reporting.
The opportunity flow must be improved by using AI-driven research and automated insights.
Field sellers must be able to access contextual research about customers and competitors while working on opportunities.
All opportunity revenue must be calculated using opportunity line items based on selected Contoso Ltd.’s products and standard pricing
Sales managers must receive an external quarterly competitive intelligence brief to help with their research. This should be delivered as a PDF document.
Sales performance
Sales managers require improved pipeline and revenue forecasting capabilities. The managers need to report on their business performance and use insights, visuals, and recommended next actions.
The new solution must provide the following:
Notify the seller’s manager when a draft quote is created and requires approval.
Allow leadership to track performance against revenue goals.
Ask questions about Dynamics 365 Sales data to support executive analysis and decision making.
Technical requirements
Contoso Ltd.'s IT department defines the following priorities for the sales platform.
AI capabilities
The platform must support the following AI features:
Lead scoring to guide sellers to priority items.
Opportunity research insights to prepare deal analysis.
AI-powered research and analytics to aid leadership reporting.
Automation
Automation must be implemented to guide sellers through recommended next steps during the sales cycle.
Any approvals must use the Power Automate Approvals connector.
Field sellers use the existing Lead to Opportunity Business Process Flow to manage their leads.
A Power Automate desktop flow is used to process orders into a partner ordering application that completes fulfillment.
AI-driven insights
The company is deploying the Sales accelerator to guide seller activities.
The Sales Research Agent
Sales managers will use the Sales Research Agent to gather intelligence about customer organizations.
The sales managers have the following requirements:
Must be able to reuse visualizations after they are created; they don’t want to recreate them.
Must have a consistent method to quickly return to a blueprint that they frequently use.
Must be able to retain a library of questions to receive consistent responses based on definitions approved by the company.
Should have Bing search enabled on the environment for generative AI feature settings.
Platform extensions
The IT department plan to extend the platform by doing the following:
Create Power Automate flows to automate seller tasks.
Embed Power BI reports for sales analytics.
Testing
The IT department is testing predictive lead scoring with a small group of sellers.
The IT department edits the existing lead scoring model by adding new fields.
Issues
Users have reported the following issues:
Field sellers spend a significant amount of time researching customers before engaging with prospects.
Testers report they cannot access the field changes in the lead score.
A sales manager generated a blueprint but forgot the competitive intelligence brief.
You need to resolve the competitive intelligence brief issue for the sales manager.
What three actions should you do? Each correct answer presents part of the solution. Choose three.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
Community Insight
The core concept tested is the lifecycle management of Sales Research Agent blueprints; the common trap is confusing 'refreshing' with 'regenerating' or assuming CSV upload suffices for PDF delivery requirements.
This question addresses resolving a specific issue in Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales where a Sales Research Agent blueprint fails to generate the required competitive intelligence brief. It establishes that regenerating the canvas, adding the missing data source, and uploading the PDF are the necessary corrective actions.
Candidates often select C (Refresh the canvas) instead of E (Regenerate the canvas), failing to understand that regeneration is required to incorporate new data sources or re-evaluate the logic for the output format.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The Sales Research Agent uses blueprints to gather intelligence. When a manager generates a blueprint but forgets the competitive intelligence brief, it implies the blueprint's configuration or data inputs are incomplete or stale relative to the desired output. To resolve this: 1. Add a data source (B): The brief likely requires external market or competitor data not currently linked to the blueprint. Adding the correct data source is fundamental. 2. Upload the competitive intelligence brief as a PDF file (D): The business requirement explicitly states the brief should be delivered as a PDF document. Uploading the relevant PDF content ensures the agent has the material to synthesize or reference. 3. Regenerate the canvas (E): After adjusting data sources and ensuring content availability, the blueprint (canvas) must be regenerated to process the new inputs and produce the updated intelligence brief. Refreshing (C) only updates the view without re-running the underlying AI analysis.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
A. Upload the competitive intelligence brief as a CSV file: Incorrect because the requirement specifies a PDF document. CSV is for structured data, not the final report format. C. Refresh the canvas: Incorrect because refreshing merely reloads the current state. It does not trigger the AI model to re-analyze data or incorporate new sources/contents like regeneration does.Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly favors B, D, and E. Users note that A is wrong due to the PDF requirement, and C is wrong because it doesn't solve the "forgotten" aspect which requires re-processing (regeneration). One commenter noted "why not BCD", highlighting the confusion between refresh and regenerate.Exam Strategy
Always map the output format requirement (PDF vs CSV) to the data handling action first. Then, distinguish between UI updates (Refresh) and backend processing/re-evaluation (Regenerate) when dealing with AI agents.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is Regenerate Canvas needed instead of Refresh?
Regeneration triggers the AI agent to re-process data sources and content, whereas Refresh only updates the visual interface without re-running the analysis.
Can I use CSV for the competitive intelligence brief?
No, the business requirement explicitly mandates the brief be delivered as a PDF document, so uploading as CSV is incorrect.
Related Analysis
Practice All AB-210 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full AB-210 Practice Test →