How Does an FTD Behind a PAT Router Register to Cisco FMC?
A security engineer is adding three Cisco FTD devices to a Cisco FMC. Two of the devices have successfully registered to the Cisco FMC. The device that is unable to register is located behind a router that translates all outbound traffic to the router’s WAN IP address. Which two steps are required for this device to register to the Cisco FMC? (Choose two.)
Community Insight
The exam tests how FMC authenticates a managed device when its real IP is hidden behind PAT — identity must come from a NAT ID rather than an IP address, and the trap is assuming FMC can still be pointed at a private address or a translated port.
Registering a Cisco FTD that sits behind a PAT/NAT router requires a shared NAT ID between the device and Cisco FMC plus leaving the device's IP address blank in FMC. This page confirms options B and D as the two required steps and explains why reconfiguring FMC with a private IP, hostname, or PAT port fails.
Choosing option A (point FMC at the device's private IP address) or option C (use the hostname), because both assume FMC can reach the device directly — but the router performs PAT, so no inbound mapping to the device exists and the private address is unroutable from FMC.
Community Discussion (14 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Cisco's device-management documentation states that when a managed device is behind NAT you add it to the management center using a unique NAT ID while leaving the device IP address blank, and on the device itself you supply the management center's reachable address, the registration key, and the same NAT ID. Option B captures the first half — the NAT ID must exist on both the FMC object and the FTD (via the configure manager add command's nat_id argument) so the two sides can match the registration handshake without relying on an IP address. Option D captures the second half — the IP address field for that device in the FMC must be cleared, because PAT assigns the router's WAN address and a dynamically chosen port, making any statically entered address wrong. Together they let the FTD initiate the connection outbound and prove its identity with the NAT ID and registration key.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A is wrong because entering the device's private IP address does not make it routable from the FMC; PAT performs port-level translation and there is no static inbound path back to that private address, which is exactly why the NAT ID mechanism exists as an alternative to IP-based identification. Option C fails for the same reason — the FMC does not resolve an FTD's hostname across a PAT boundary, and Cisco's guidance is to leave the address blank rather than substitute a name; the DONTRESOLVE keyword applies to the device side when the FMC is not directly addressable, not as a fix for the FMC's device record. Option E is a classic distractor: the PAT source port is assigned dynamically per flow, so it cannot be appended to the device entry as a stable identifier.
Community Comment Notes
Several learners converged on the same pair of steps. Kris92 explained that because PAT dynamically assigns ports, "you cannot initiate a connection to a device behind a PAT router," which is why identity has to come from something other than address and port. Stevens0103 guaranteed B and D and quoted the guidance that you "specify only the NAT ID and the registration key on the FMC; leave the IP address blank." Initial14 gave the same operational recipe — a unique NAT ID per device on the FMC with the IP blank, and the management center IP plus NAT ID on the FTD — and al1 cited the Cisco device-management page, where the NAT Environment topic is documented. Joe_Blue's AB pick drew a direct rebuttal from Kris92, who pointed out that A and B contradict each other and that such answers, while sometimes plausible, are not reliable.
One dissenting voice, Demon_Queen_Velverosa, argued for B and C from a cert guide, but that reading conflicts with the vendor text that requires the FMC device entry to have no IP address when the device is behind NAT.
Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Memorize the symmetric pairing: FMC gets the NAT ID with a blank IP, the FTD gets the FMC address, registration key, and the same NAT ID. Any option that tries to fix NAT registration by pointing at a private IP, a hostname, or a specific PAT port is a distractor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why can't the FMC just use the FTD's private IP address to register a device behind PAT?
The router performs port address translation, so the private address is not routable from the FMC and no inbound mapping exists. Registration must instead be matched by a shared NAT ID.
Why is adding the PAT port number to the device IP in the FMC wrong?
PAT assigns source ports dynamically per flow, so the port is not a stable identifier. The FMC authenticates the device with the NAT ID and registration key, not an address-plus-port pair.