Cisco FTDv Licensing Model Valid Statements
Which two statements are valid regarding the licensing model used on Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual appliances? (Choose two.)
Community Votes
60% of anonymous learners picked answer DE. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The question tests the portability features of the Cisco FTDv licensing model, and the common trap is assuming virtual licenses are restricted only to virtual cloud platforms or cannot be used on physical appliances.
This page clarifies the valid statements regarding the Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (FTDv) licensing model. It establishes that FTDv licenses are portable across both physical and virtual appliances as well as any supported cloud platform.
Choosing B and E because learners assume all FTDv licenses allow up to 16 vCPUs, ignoring that vCPU limits are typically tier-specific in the datasheet, or assuming virtual licenses cannot apply to physical appliances.
Community Discussion (8 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Options D and E are correct because Cisco's official FTDv datasheet explicitly states that there is "License portability across clouds." The datasheet further elaborates that you can deploy appliances with "the portability of one license to support virtual and physical solutions across public or private clouds." This confirms that licenses can be used on both physical and virtual appliances (D) and on any supported cloud platform (E).Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A is incorrect because VPN peer limits vary by license tier; for example, the FTDv100 tier supports up to 1000 VPN peers, not a maximum of 250. Option B is incorrect because vCPU support is tied to the specific performance tier; only the FTDv100 tier supports up to 16 vCPUs, while lower tiers support fewer. Option C is incorrect because the storage requirement for the FTDv VM is 50 GB, not 500 GB.Community Comment Notes
There is disagreement in the community over whether virtual and physical licenses are interchangeable. Some users argue they are separate, while others point out a specific Cisco datasheet snippet. As aaInman noted, the datasheet explicitly mentions "the portability of one license to support virtual and physical solutions", confirming option D. Additionally, MooseMullay correctly pointed out that storage requirements are much lower than 500G, invalidating option C.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
For FTDv licensing questions, rely on the official Cisco datasheet quotes regarding "License portability." Do not assume virtual licenses are strictly isolated from physical deployments if the latest datasheet indicates portability.