Impact of Push Model for Network Monitoring Devices

Describe the impact of model-driven telemetry on the network

What is the impact of the push model for monitoring devices on the network?

  1. limited scale for real-time data access
  2. real-time access to resource utilization
  3. periodic polling of network resources and events
  4. trigger notifications for data change utilization Correct Answer
Answer Correct answer: D — The push model impacts the network by triggering notifications for data change utilization, sending updates proactively rather than waiting for poll requests.

Community Insight

This question tests the difference between push and pull monitoring models, where the common trap is confusing proactive event-driven updates with reactive periodic polling.

The push model in network monitoring sends data proactively when changes occur, contrasting with the pull model's periodic polling. This question establishes that the primary impact is triggering notifications upon data utilization changes.

Option C is the most common wrong answer because it describes the traditional pull/polling method, which learners often confuse with modern telemetry push mechanisms.

Community Discussion (2 comments)

e14efdb 👍 1 Selected: D
I fully agree with drinu89.
drinu89 👍 1 Selected: D
This describes a push model: the device sends updates/notifications when data changes or according to a subscription, rather than waiting to be polled.

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

The push model involves devices or agents sending data to a collector automatically when specific conditions are met, such as a change in resource utilization. Option D accurately describes this behavior as "trigger notifications for data change utilization," which aligns with how model-driven telemetry (MDT) and streaming telemetry operate by pushing updates rather than waiting for requests.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option C describes the traditional pull model, where the management system periodically polls devices for status, which is the opposite of a push model. Option A is incorrect because push models typically offer better scalability for real-time data compared to heavy polling loads. Option B describes an outcome (real-time access) but not the mechanism; while push enables real-time access, the defining characteristic of the push model itself is the notification trigger on change, not just the availability of the data.

Community Comment Notes

The community consensus strongly supports Option D. As drinu89 noted, "This describes a push model: the device sends updates/notifications when data changes or according to a subscription, rather than waiting to be polled." Another user agreed, reinforcing that the key distinction is the proactive nature of the update delivery.

Exam Strategy

When studying network monitoring, always distinguish between 'pull' (polling) and 'push' (streaming/subscriptions). Remember that push models reduce latency and network overhead by only sending data when necessary, whereas pull models can create bottlenecks during frequent polling intervals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Option C incorrect for push model?

Option C describes periodic polling, which is the definition of a pull model. In a push model, the device initiates the data transfer, not the manager.

Does push model affect network scale?

While Option A suggests limited scale, push models can actually improve scalability by reducing constant query traffic, though high-frequency pushes need careful design.

More 300-420 FAQ →

Related Analysis

Practice All 300-420 Questions

Access 150 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.

View Full 300-420 Practice Test →

← Back to 300-420 Study Guide