Why should team members understand an automated script?
A security analyst developed a script to automate a trivial and repeatable task. Which of the following best describes the benefits of ensuring other team members understand how the script works?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests your ability to recognize how cross-training mitigates key-person risk, while the trap confuses personnel dependency with technical system failures.
Sharing knowledge of automated scripts eliminates key-person dependency and ensures uninterrupted business operations. The community unanimously agrees that cross-training directly mitigates personnel-related single points of failure.
Option C is frequently selected incorrectly because candidates conflate undocumented automation with technical debt, overlooking that the scenario specifically addresses operational continuity through shared expertise rather than code refactoring.
Community Discussion (5 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Sharing script knowledge directly addresses key-person dependency, which is a classic single point of failure in IT operations. When multiple team members can maintain, debug, or execute the automation, the organization avoids downtime if the original developer is unavailable. CompTIA emphasizes this practice as a core component of robust operational security and change management protocols.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A focuses on financial savings, but cross-training scripts does not inherently lower initial implementation costs. Option B suggests identifying complexity, yet the prompt explicitly states the task is trivial and repeatable. Option C references technical debt, which typically involves poor code quality or lack of documentation over time, not the immediate operational risk of sole ownership.Community Comment Notes
The community strongly supports D, noting that relying on one individual creates unnecessary operational risk. Comment [2] correctly highlights that shared knowledge eliminates reliance on a single employee during script failures or absences. Comment [4] reinforces this by emphasizing continuity and reduced individual dependency. While Comment [3] argues the script itself remains a single point of failure, this misses the question’s focus on personnel training rather than architectural redundancy.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When answering questions about automation or documentation, always look for keywords like "understand," "share," or "cross-train," as they typically point to mitigating key-person dependency. Avoid selecting options focused on cost or code quality unless the scenario explicitly mentions budget constraints or legacy system issues.
Related Analysis
Practice All SY0-701 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SY0-701 Practice Test →