When are Roles and Responsibilities Reviewed in Incident Response?
Which of the following is the phase in the incident response process when a security analyst reviews roles and responsibilities?
Community Votes
74% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
This question tests the distinction between establishing procedures (Preparation) and analyzing past events (Lessons Learned), with the common trap being the assumption that 'review' implies post-incident analysis.
The CompTIA SY0-701 exam tests knowledge of the NIST incident response lifecycle, specifically distinguishing between initial setup and continuous improvement. Community consensus confirms that reviewing roles and responsibilities is a core activity of the Preparation phase.
Candidates often select Lessons Learned because they associate the word 'reviews' with retrospective analysis. However, the Preparation phase includes ongoing maintenance and review of the incident response plan to ensure it remains current before incidents occur.
Community Discussion (10 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The correct answer is Preparation. According to NIST SP 800-61, the Preparation phase involves establishing an incident response team, defining roles and responsibilities, and maintaining the incident response plan. This phase is not a one-time event but includes regular reviews and updates to ensure readiness.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Analysis (D) focuses on triaging and investigating active incidents, not planning roles. Recovery (B) involves restoring systems to normal operations after containment. Lessons Learned (C) is conducted after an incident is closed to identify improvements; while it may result in changes to roles, the act of reviewing and maintaining these definitions as part of operational readiness falls under Preparation.Community Comment Notes
Comment [2] correctly notes that preparation includes 'ongoing review and maintenance.' Comment [3] emphasizes that roles should be reviewed regularly for good preparation, distinct from retrospective lessons learned. Comment [5] highlights the trap of focusing solely on the keyword 'reviews' without considering the context of proactive vs. reactive phases.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Focus on the intent of each IR phase: Preparation is about readiness and maintenance, while Lessons Learned is about retrospective improvement. When you see 'review' or 'update,' check if it refers to maintaining the plan's effectiveness (Preparation) or analyzing a specific event's outcome (Lessons Learned).
Related Analysis
Practice All SY0-701 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SY0-701 Practice Test →