How Does Data Encryption Protect Against Unauthorized Vendor Access in IaaS?
It was discovered that a service provider's administrator was accessing sensitive information without the approval of the customer in an Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) model. Which of the following would BEST protect against a future recurrence?
Community Votes
67% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests understanding of the cloud shared responsibility model and control prioritization, with the common trap being choosing contractual requirements instead of the direct technical safeguard that actually prevents data compromise.
In an IaaS environment, data encryption ensures that sensitive information remains confidential even if a service provider administrator gains unauthorized access. CRISC candidates and community experts consistently agree that encryption is the most effective technical control to mitigate this specific data exposure risk.
Many candidates select contractual requirements, assuming legal agreements are sufficient to prevent vendor breaches. However, contracts lack technical enforcement and cannot stop an administrator from reading plaintext data once accessed, making them a weaker immediate control than encryption.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Data encryption is the optimal control because it directly addresses the confidentiality requirement of the CIA triad, regardless of who accesses the underlying infrastructure. Under the IaaS shared responsibility model, the customer retains ownership and security of their data, meaning they must implement cryptographic controls to protect it from CSP administrators. Even if a provider staff bypasses logical access controls, encrypted data at rest or in transit remains unreadable without the proper keys, effectively neutralizing the insider threat.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Intrusion prevention systems monitor network traffic but cannot stop an administrator using legitimate infrastructure credentials to access storage volumes. Two-factor authentication strengthens identity verification but does not prevent an already authenticated privileged user from misusing their access to view sensitive files. Contractual requirements establish governance and legal recourse but provide no technical mechanism to block or obfuscate data during an unauthorized access event, making them reactive rather than protective.Community Comment Notes
Multiple high-voted comments emphasize that in IaaS, customers are solely responsible for securing their own data payloads [1]. Experts note that encryption serves as the ultimate fail-safe when trust boundaries between organizations break down [3]. While some users initially lean toward contractual clauses for vendor oversight, the consensus confirms that technical data protection takes precedence in risk mitigation hierarchies for exposed sensitive information [2].Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When evaluating risk treatments for third-party or cloud scenarios, prioritize technical controls that directly mitigate the specific asset exposure over administrative or legal measures. Always map the control back to the shared responsibility model to determine which party holds the actual risk owner role for the affected data layer.
Related Analysis
Practice All CRISC Questions
Access 332 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CRISC Practice Test →