Does Cutoff Testing Provide Indirect Audit Evidence?
Which of the following do NOT indirect information?
Community Votes
75% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests your ability to classify audit evidence types, with the common trap being mistaking negative reconciliation results or exception reports for direct proof.
This CRISC question tests the distinction between direct and indirect audit evidence, focusing on how different reporting mechanisms support risk assessments. While analytical and exception reports yield indirect insights, cutoff propriety represents direct verification.
Candidates frequently select D, assuming that a lack of difference provides no information whatsoever, overlooking that negative results still serve as indirect evidence of control effectiveness.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option A is correct because verifying the propriety of cutoff is a substantive audit procedure that directly confirms whether transactions are recorded in the appropriate accounting period. Unlike analytical or exception-based data, cutoff testing relies on explicit documentation and direct transaction tracing, making it direct rather than indirect evidence.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Options B and C utilize exception reporting and analytical reviews, which inherently rely on inference and trend analysis to highlight underlying risks, representing classic characteristics of indirect information. Option D reflects negative reconciliation evidence; while not overtly positive, the absence of variances indirectly supports the reliability of inventory controls and valuation assertions without providing explicit transactional proof.Community Comment Notes
Although the majority of voters selected D, experienced auditors and ISACA-aligned resources consistently point to A as the correct choice. Comment [1] correctly distinguishes direct assessment from indirect inference, highlighting that cutoff validation explicitly targets period-end accuracy without requiring analytical deduction.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Always categorize audit evidence by its derivation method: direct evidence comes from explicit observation, inspection, or confirmation, while indirect evidence emerges from analytical procedures, trend analysis, or exception reporting. When faced with 'does NOT' questions, eliminate options that clearly use inference first.
Related Analysis
Practice All CRISC Questions
Access 332 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CRISC Practice Test →