Which Option Is a Benefit of Economies of Scale in Cloud Computing?
Which option is a benefit of the economies of scale based on the advantages of cloud computing?
Community Insight
You must map the phrase 'economies of scale' to AWS's own advantage wording — lower variable cost than you can achieve alone — and the trap is option A, which reverses the real fixed-to-variable trade into variable-to-fixed.
Economies of scale in AWS cloud computing means aggregated customer usage drives down per-unit pay-as-you-go pricing, so you achieve a lower variable cost than you could on your own. This page confirms that lower variable costs relative to fixed costs is the correct answer and explains why the other three options misstate the benefit.
Many learners pick A ('trade variable expense for fixed expense') because they half-remember the AWS 'trade fixed expense for variable expense' advantage; the direction is inverted, and fixed expense is precisely what cloud computing reduces, not what it introduces.
Community Discussion (26 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Amazon's own description of the six advantages of cloud computing states that by using cloud computing you can "achieve a lower variable cost than you can get on your own", because usage from hundreds of thousands of customers is aggregated and providers such as AWS achieve higher economies of scale. Option C expresses exactly that outcome: variable costs that are lower than the fixed costs you would otherwise carry for owned infrastructure. The economics are straightforward — large providers spread data center, hardware and power costs across an enormous customer base, so each incremental unit of compute or storage is cheaper per unit than a customer-built equivalent. AWS passes part of that efficiency back as lower pay-as-you-go prices, which is why the end user experiences lower variable costs rather than a large up-front fixed commitment.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A reverses the actual AWS advantage: the benefit is trading fixed expense for variable expense (moving from capital investment to usage-based billing), not the reverse. Turning variable spend into fixed spend would recreate the on-premises problem the cloud is meant to solve. Option B, increased speed and agility, is a genuine advantage of cloud computing, but it is a separate item in the six advantages list and has nothing to do with scale-driven unit cost reduction. Option D, increased operational costs across data centers, contradicts the entire premise of economies of scale — aggregation exists to lower operational cost per unit, and customers do not operate data centers at all when using AWS.Community Comment Notes
Several learners converge on C, including LinuxChamp, who simply states "C = CORRECT", and Ellbi, who quotes the AWS wording about achieving "a lower variable cost than you can get on your own" through aggregated customer usage. BShelat and mehr112 both point to the AWS 'six advantages of cloud computing' whitepaper page as the authoritative source, which is the same reference this explanation relies on. Mike_84 documents the exact self-correction many candidates make, admitting after re-reading that "we are talking benefit of the economies of scale and it is indeed Lower variable costs over fixed costs". axat adds the on-premises contrast, noting that traditional environments require fixed infrastructure investment regardless of actual demand, while cloud scaling follows demand.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Memorize the six advantages of cloud computing verbatim — trade fixed expense for variable expense, massive economies of scale, stop guessing capacity, increase speed and agility, stop spending money running data centers, go global in minutes — and note that each answer option usually paraphrases one of them. If an option inverts a phrase (variable for fixed instead of fixed for variable), it is the distractor.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is 'trade variable expense for fixed expense' wrong for economies of scale?
It inverts the real AWS advantage, which is trading fixed expense for variable expense. Moving to fixed costs would recreate the on-premises capital-spend problem.
Is increased speed and agility the same as economies of scale?
No. Speed and agility is a separate advantage of cloud computing about provisioning resources faster; economies of scale is purely about lower per-unit cost from aggregated demand.
Related Analysis
Practice All CLF-C02 Questions
Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CLF-C02 Practice Test →