Which EC2 Instance Type Supports Windows Server BYOL?

Identify AWS compute services. Understand concepts of cloud economics.
Answer Correct answer: C — Dedicated Hosts is the EC2 option that gives socket/core visibility for reusing per-socket, per-core, or per-VM Microsoft Windows Server licenses.

When a user wants to utilize their existing per-socket, per-core, or per-virtual machine software licenses for a Microsoft Windows server running on AWS, which Amazon EC2 instance type is required?

  1. Spot Instances
  2. Dedicated Instances
  3. Dedicated Hosts Correct Answer
  4. Reserved Instances

Community Votes

C
100%

100% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Community Insight

The question tests EC2 licensing/BYOL: the trap is confusing Dedicated Hosts with Dedicated Instances, which offer single-tenant hardware but not the socket/core visibility needed for per-socket or per-core license reuse.

Dedicated Hosts are the Amazon EC2 option that provides the socket and core visibility needed to reuse existing per-socket, per-core, or per-VM Microsoft Windows Server licenses on AWS. This page confirms why C is correct and why Dedicated Instances, Spot Instances, and Reserved Instances do not satisfy BYOL licensing terms.

Choosing Dedicated Instances (B) because they also provide single-tenant hardware; however, they do not expose physical sockets or cores, so they cannot satisfy per-socket, per-core, or per-VM BYOL terms.

Community Discussion (4 comments)

[Removed] 👍 2 Selected: C
Dedicated Hosts provide comprehensive Bring Your Own License (BYOL) support. They allow you to use your existing per-socket, per-core, or per-VM software licenses, including Windows Server, SQL Server, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, or other software licenses that are bound to VMs, sockets, or physical cores, subject to your license terms. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/WindowsGuide/dedicated-hosts-overview.html
BShelat 👍 2 Selected: C
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/WindowsGuide/dedicated-hosts-overview.html#:~:text=Dedicated%20Instances.-,Bring%20your%20own%20license,-Dedicated%20Hosts%20allow
petercorn 👍 3 Selected: C
Dedicated Hosts allow you to use your existing per-socket, per-core, or per-VM software licenses https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/dedicated-hosts/
Aghajee 👍 1
C. Dedicated Hosts When a user wants to utilize their existing per-socket, per-core, or per-virtual machine software licenses for a Microsoft Windows server running on AWS, they can use Dedicated Hosts.

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

Dedicated Hosts allocate an entire physical server to your AWS account and expose the number of sockets and physical cores on that host, which is exactly what Microsoft per-socket, per-core, and per-VM license terms require. AWS documents that Dedicated Hosts provide Bring Your Own License (BYOL) support for Windows Server, SQL Server, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, and RHEL. Because you control instance placement on the host, you can align running instances with existing license entitlements instead of buying new ones. In this CLF-C02 scenario, the phrase "existing per-socket, per-core, or per-virtual machine software licenses" is the signal for Dedicated Hosts. Community consensus agrees, with every recorded vote selecting C.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Spot Instances are spare EC2 capacity that can be reclaimed with a two-minute interruption notice; they are a pricing mechanism and provide no host-level socket or core visibility, so they cannot satisfy BYOL terms. Dedicated Instances provide single-tenant hardware isolation, but AWS explicitly contrasts them with Dedicated Hosts for BYOL because Dedicated Instances do not expose the physical sockets and cores. Reserved Instances are a billing discount applied to matching instance usage, not a tenancy model that grants license visibility; they may be combined with Dedicated Hosts, but alone they do not meet the question's requirement. None of these options gives the per-socket or per-core mapping Microsoft licensing requires.

Community Comment Notes

petercorn pointed directly to the AWS Dedicated Hosts page and stated that they "use your existing per-socket, per-core, or per-VM software licenses", matching the question wording almost exactly. Another commenter, now shown as removed, expanded on BYOL support for Windows Server, SQL Server, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server, and RHEL, reinforcing that Dedicated Hosts are the licensing-oriented choice. BShelat linked the AWS Windows Dedicated Hosts overview, whose BYOL section is the canonical source for this distinction. Aghajee restated the same conclusion without dissent, and all recorded votes landed on Dedicated Hosts.

Official Reference

Exam Strategy

When you see per-socket, per-core, or per-VM license language in CLF-C02, map it to Dedicated Hosts rather than Dedicated Instances. Read the tenancy and licensing keywords before choosing a pricing model such as Spot or Reserved Instances.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why don't Dedicated Instances support per-socket Windows Server licenses?

Dedicated Instances give single-tenant hardware but do not expose the physical sockets or cores, so they cannot satisfy per-socket or per-core BYOL license terms.

Can Reserved Instances be used for BYOL instead of Dedicated Hosts?

No. Reserved Instances are a billing discount and do not expose host sockets or cores, so they fail the per-socket, per-core, or per-VM license requirement.

More CLF-C02 FAQ →

Related Analysis

Practice All CLF-C02 Questions

Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.

View Full CLF-C02 Practice Test →

← Back to CLF-C02 Study Guide