AWS WAF for CloudFront HTTP/HTTPS Monitoring
A company wants to monitor and block malicious HTTP and HTTPS requests that its Amazon CloudFront distributions receive. Which AWS service should the company use to meet these requirements?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The question tests knowledge of AWS managed services for web traffic security, specifically distinguishing between network-level protection (WAF) and threat intelligence (GuardDuty).
AWS WAF is the correct service to monitor and block malicious HTTP/HTTPS requests at Amazon CloudFront distributions. This page explains why AWS WAF is the standard solution for web application firewalls in AWS.
Candidates often incorrectly choose Amazon GuardDuty because it provides threat detection, but GuardDuty does not actively block HTTP/HTTPS requests like a Web Application Firewall.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Amazon Web Services (AWS) WAF (Web Application Firewall) is designed specifically to protect web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. It inspects HTTP and HTTPS requests and allows you to create rules to allow, block, or count web requests based on conditions such as IP addresses, HTTP headers, body content, URI strings, and query strings. Since the requirement is to monitor and block malicious requests for CloudFront distributions, AWS WAF is the ideal integrated solution.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Amazon GuardDuty is a threat detection service that uses machine learning to identify suspicious activity, such as compromised instances or unauthorized API calls, but it does not act as a firewall to block HTTP/HTTPS traffic. Amazon Inspector is an automated security assessment service that scans EC2 instances and container images for vulnerabilities and deviations from best practices; it does not filter live web traffic. Amazon Detective analyzes logs and traces to investigate potential security issues but does not have the capability to block incoming requests.Community Comment Notes
The community consensus strongly supports AWS WAF. As one user noted, "HTTP HTTPS deals with web so AWS WAF ez:)" Another comment reinforced this by stating that "An AWS WAF rule defines how to inspect HTTP(S) web requests and the action to take..." These comments highlight the direct link between web protocols and the WAF service.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When a question mentions blocking or allowing web traffic (HTTP/HTTPS), immediately consider AWS WAF. If the question involves analyzing logs for threats without blocking, look for GuardDuty or CloudTrail.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use AWS WAF with CloudFront?
Yes, AWS WAF integrates directly with CloudFront distributions to filter web requests before they reach your origin.
Does GuardDuty block malicious traffic?
No, GuardDuty detects threats but does not block them. You need a service like AWS WAF or Security Groups for blocking.
Related Analysis
Practice All CLF-C02 Questions
Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CLF-C02 Practice Test →