Which AWS Service Provides a Managed SMB File Server for Windows?

Answer Correct answer: C — Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is the fully managed Windows file server with native SMB support for Microsoft workloads.

A company needs a fully managed file server that natively supports Microsoft workloads and file systems. The file server must also support the SMB protocol. Which AWS service should the company use to meet these requirements?

  1. Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)
  2. Amazon FSx for Lustre
  3. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server Correct Answer
  4. Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS)

Community Votes

C
100%

100% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Community Insight

The question tests matching a fully managed file service to Windows and SMB requirements, and the common trap is choosing a general-purpose or block storage service that lacks native SMB and Windows Server integration.

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is the AWS fully managed file storage service that natively supports Microsoft Windows workloads and the SMB protocol. This page confirms why option C is correct over Amazon EFS, Amazon FSx for Lustre, and Amazon EBS.

Many learners choose Amazon EFS because it is the best-known AWS managed file system, but EFS uses NFS and is designed for Linux workloads rather than native SMB or Windows file-system features.

Community Discussion (3 comments)

BShelat 👍 2 Selected: C
https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/windows/
petercorn 👍 1 Selected: C
Provide highly available, high performance storage to your Windows applications with full SMB support. https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/windows/
Aghajee 👍 2
C. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is the AWS service that provides a fully managed file server that natively supports Microsoft workloads and file systems. It is built on Windows Server and supports the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol, making it suitable for seamlessly integrating with Microsoft applications and workloads.

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed native Microsoft Windows file system that is built on Windows Server and supports the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol. It integrates with Microsoft Active Directory, Windows access control lists, DFS namespaces, and shadow copies, so it directly matches the requirement for a file server that natively supports Microsoft workloads and file systems. Choosing C satisfies both the "fully managed" and "SMB" parts of the scenario in one service, which is exactly what the question asks. The community is unanimous here: Aghajee noted that it is "built on Windows Server" and supports SMB, while BShelat and petercorn both pointed to the official AWS FSx for Windows page. No other option provides a managed Windows file server endpoint with native SMB support.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Amazon EFS is a fully managed file system, but it implements the NFS protocol and is optimized for Linux-based workloads, so it does not natively serve SMB shares or Windows file-system features. Amazon FSx for Lustre is designed for high-performance computing and Linux POSIX workloads, and it does not provide native SMB or Windows Server integration. Amazon EBS provides block-level storage volumes for EC2 instances, not a managed file server; a company would have to build and manage its own Windows file server on top of EBS, which fails the "fully managed file server" requirement. Each wrong option fails at least one explicit criterion, while FSx for Windows File Server satisfies all of them.

Community Comment Notes

Every recorded vote on this question selected C, and the comments reinforce the same reasoning rather than adding any dispute. BShelat and petercorn both shared the AWS FSx for Windows page as supporting evidence, and petercorn emphasized that it provides "full SMB support" for Windows applications. Aghajee gave the clearest explanation, describing it as a fully managed file server built on Windows Server that supports SMB for seamless integration with Microsoft applications. That community consensus aligns with the technical requirements and the vendor documentation, so there is no reason to doubt option C.

Official Reference

Exam Strategy

When a scenario explicitly names SMB, Microsoft workloads, or Windows-native file-system features, narrow your choices immediately to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Eliminate EFS for NFS/Linux use cases and FSx for Lustre for HPC/POSIX workloads, and remember that EBS is block storage rather than a managed file service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why not Amazon EFS for SMB file sharing?

Amazon EFS uses the NFS protocol and is optimized for Linux workloads, so it does not natively provide Windows ACLs, Active Directory integration, or SMB sharing.

Does Amazon FSx for Lustre support SMB and Windows workloads?

No, Amazon FSx for Lustre is built for high-performance computing and Linux POSIX workloads; it does not provide native SMB or Windows Server features.

More CLF-C02 FAQ →

Related Analysis

Practice All CLF-C02 Questions

Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.

View Full CLF-C02 Practice Test →

← Back to CLF-C02 Study Guide