Which Sampling Method Deems a Sample Irregular After One Error?
In which of the following sampling methods is the entire sample considered to be irregular if a single error is found?
Community Votes
57% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests your understanding of attribute sampling objectives, with the common trap being confusion between discovery sampling's all-or-nothing detection goal and stop-or-go sampling's sequential evaluation process.
Discovery sampling is specifically designed to detect rare occurrences, meaning finding a single error immediately invalidates the sample's reliability. While community votes are split between discovery and stop-or-go sampling, audit standards confirm discovery sampling as the correct answer.
Option B (Stop-or-go sampling) is frequently chosen because its sequential nature stops testing upon the first error, but this method adjusts conclusions based on risk thresholds rather than automatically declaring the entire sample irregular.
Community Discussion (7 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Discovery sampling is engineered for scenarios where auditors expect zero or near-zero exceptions in a population. The sample size is mathematically calculated so that detecting even one deviation provides statistical confidence that the actual error rate exceeds an acceptable threshold. Consequently, a single found error immediately flags the population as potentially materially misstated, rendering the sample unreliable without expanded substantive testing.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Stop-or-go sampling (B) uses sequential testing to reach a decision quickly but does not treat a single error as fatal; it simply triggers additional scrutiny or acceptance/rejection based on preset alpha/beta risks. Variable sampling (C) focuses on quantifying monetary misstatements rather than detecting binary irregularities. Judgmental sampling (D) relies entirely on auditor intuition without statistical formulas, so it lacks the rigid "single error = invalid" rule defined by statistical design.Community Comment Notes
Several candidates initially favored stop-or-go sampling due to its name implying immediate termination upon error detection [Comment 1]. However, experienced auditors clarified that discovery sampling's primary purpose is exactly this scenario: detecting fraud or severe control failures where any occurrence is unacceptable [Comment 2, 3]. The high vote split reflects a common misconception about sequential versus exhaustive statistical designs.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Focus on the objective of each sampling type rather than memorizing definitions. When a question mentions 'rare errors,' 'fraud detection,' or 'one error invalidates the population,' immediately select discovery sampling.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn't stop-or-go sampling the right choice here?
Stop-or-go sampling uses sequential testing to accept or reject a population based on preset risk levels, not to instantly invalidate the entire sample upon one error.
When should I use discovery sampling on the CISA exam?
Use it when the audit objective is detecting rare events like fraud or critical control failures, where even one occurrence signals a material population issue.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISA Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISA Practice Test →