What Is the Greatest Advantage of Outsourcing an E-Banking Solution Without In-House Expertise?
Which of the following is the GREATEST advantage of outsourcing the development of an e-banking solution when in-house technical expertise is not available?
Community Votes
50% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The question tests whether you can identify cost savings as the primary advantage of outsourcing when no internal technical team exists; the common trap is confusing vendor expertise with easy adaptability.
Outsourcing e-banking development is most beneficial when the organisation lacks in-house expertise because it reduces start-up costs. This page explains why option D is correct and why the competing adaptability answer is a misconception.
Selecting 'A. Increased ability to adapt the system' is common because vendor specialists seem useful, but outsourcing actually reduces flexibility compared with in-house staff and does not address the 'no expertise' condition as well as cost savings.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The condition in the question is that the organization does not possess in-house technical expertise. That makes D the strongest option: lower start-up costs arise because outsourcing lets the project use the vendor's existing technical staff, tools, and infrastructure instead of paying to develop or hire those capabilities internally. For an e-banking solution, where qualified developers and security expertise are scarce, this initial savings is the clearest and most direct business advantage.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
A is a classic trap bought by 50 percent of learners; outsourced development generally reduces an organization's ability to adapt and customize the system later, because changes must go through the vendor and contract change control. B is not guaranteed by outsourcing because service continuity depends on the vendor's operational maturity and service-level agreements, not on the act of outsourcing itself. C is also backwards: direct oversight of risks decreases with outsourcing, since the third party controls the development process and the client loses visibility.
Community Comment Notes
Commenters supporting D captured the core point: when you lack the internal team, you don't want to hire, pay for training, or build up a full project group because that costs too much at the beginning. A learner favoring A argued that the specialized firm brings experience and can deliver a more flexible system, but that reasoning treats vendor expertise as adaptation capability and neglects the contractual and coordination limits of outsourcing. The collective vote is split 50/50, and the comments suggest most test takers recognize the cost benefit or fall for the adaptability trap.
Exam Strategy
When a CISA question conditions on a missing capability, match the answer to that capability. Outsourcing is not chosen for greater control or flexibility; it is chosen because the third party already has what the client lacks, which lowers the cost of getting started.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is lower start-up costs a greater advantage than system adaptability for this scenario?
Because the organisation cannot develop or maintain the system without costly new hires, the vendor's existing expertise saves the initial investment. Adaptability usually suffers under outsourcing since changes depend on vendor contracts.
Could outsourcing lead to worse system adaptability in e-banking?
Yes. Customization or change requests must go through the vendor, create additional fees and negotiation time, and the client has less direct control than it would with internal staff.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISA Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISA Practice Test →