How Do OSPF and EIGRP Routing Protocols Compare?

Routing Protocols

How do OSPF and EIGRP compare?

  1. Both OSPF and EIGRP use the concept of areas.
  2. OSPF and EIGRP use the same administrative distance.
  3. EIGRP shows successor and feasible successor routes, and OSPF shows all known routes. Source Reference Answer
  4. EIGRP shows all known routes, and OSPF shows successor and feasible successor routes.

Community Votes

C
100%

100% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Community Insight

The exam tests protocol-specific route selection terminology; the common trap is confusing EIGRP's successor/feasible successor concept with OSPF's link-state database behavior.

This question tests the ability to differentiate OSPF and EIGRP route selection behaviors. Community consensus confirms that EIGRP maintains successor and feasible successor routes while OSPF retains all known routes in its topology and routing tables.

Option A is frequently chosen because both protocols use hierarchical structures, but OSPF uses areas while EIGRP uses Autonomous Systems, making the statement inaccurate.

Community Discussion (3 comments)

yasmiine 👍 1 Selected: C
answer C
masrur 👍 1 Selected: C
EIGRP uses concept AS (Autonomous System), OSPF uses Area.
wamendoza 👍 1
maybe you have a confusion here but A and C are correct but A is a characteristic of both C is a comparison? Be careful with questions like that from Cisco

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

EIGRP uses the DUAL algorithm to select a successor (best route) and feasible successor (loop-free backup route) for each destination. OSPF, as a link-state protocol, calculates all shortest-path routes using Dijkstra's algorithm and stores them in the link-state database. Therefore, EIGRP explicitly identifies successor and feasible successor routes, while OSPF shows all known routes within its area topology.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A is incorrect because EIGRP uses Autonomous Systems, not areas; only OSPF uses the area concept for hierarchical design. Option B is false because OSPF has an administrative distance of 110, while EIGRP's internal routes have an AD of 90. Option D reverses the correct relationship between the two protocols' route selection terminology.

Community Comment Notes

Comment [1] correctly identifies that EIGRP uses AS while OSPF uses areas, reinforcing why Option A is wrong. Comment [2] notes that while A might seem partially correct, C is the true comparison the question seeks. Comment [3] simply confirms C as the correct answer.

Official Reference

Exam Strategy

When comparing routing protocols, focus on their unique terminology and route selection mechanisms. EIGRP's successor/feasible successor concept is exclusive to that protocol, making it a reliable differentiator from OSPF.

Related Analysis

Refer to the Exhibit. External users require HTTP connectivi

S-Grade

Refer to the exhibit. An administrator must enable RESTCONF

A-Grade

A network engineer must configure the VTY lines on a router

S-Grade

Practice All 350-401 Questions

Access 218 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.

View Full 350-401 Practice Test →

← Back to 350-401 Study Guide