SD-Access and ACI Fabric Similarities: VNIDs, Group Policy, and SGTs
Which three ways are SD-Access and ACI Fabric similar? (Choose three.)
Community Insight
The shared DNA is overlay segmentation (VNID) + SGT-driven group policy. EPGs belong to ACI only; SD-Access uses Virtual Networks plus SGTs, not EPGs.
Both Cisco SD-Access and ACI fabrics use VXLAN with Virtual Network Identifiers (VNID) for overlay segmentation, express intent through group-based policy, and enforce that policy with Scalable Group Tags (SGTs). Endpoint Groups (EPGs) are ACI-specific and are not shared by SD-Access.
Picking B (Endpoint Groups): EPGs are an ACI construct; SD-Access does not use EPGs, so it is not a shared similarity. SGTs (D) are the common tag mechanism.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
A, C, and D are correct. Both fabrics overlay VXLAN using Virtual Network Identifiers (VNID) to segment tenants/VRFs (A). Both express intent through group-based policy (C), and both implement that policy with Scalable Group Tags (SGT) carried in the fabric (D).Why the Other Options Are Wrong
B (Endpoint Groups) is wrong: EPGs are an ACI-specific object; SD-Access uses Virtual Networks and SGTs, not EPGs, so it is not a shared similarity. E (focus on user endpoints) is too generic to be a defining architectural similarity tested here.Community Comment Notes
Votes are split (AC vs AD) with no aggregate. The strongest reading: VNID (A), group policy (C), and SGT (D) are the three shared mechanisms; EPGs are ACI-only.Official Reference
Related Analysis
Practice All 300-420 Questions
Access 150 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full 300-420 Practice Test →