Where to Map a New QoS Class to a Queue in vManage?
The application team is getting ready to deploy a new business-critical application to the network. To protect the traffic, the network team must add another queue to the QoS map and then deploy the map to the fabric. Which configuration step must be completed prior to adding the queue to the QoS map and applying it?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The question tests whether you know that a QoS class-to-hardware-queue mapping is configured as a Local Policy list in vManage and that the resulting QoS map is applied to the WAN interface; the common trap is treating it as a Centralized Policy list or attaching it to the service-side interface.
In Cisco SD-WAN, adding a QoS queue requires mapping the forwarding class to a hardware output queue in the Local Policy Lists page before the QoS map can be applied. This page establishes why option A is correct: the mapping is a localized policy list operation and the QoS map is attached to the WAN interface.
The most common wrong answer is C (or its central-policy variant D), because learners assume the queue mapping is fabric-wide. In Cisco SD-WAN, the class-to-queue relationship is hardware-specific and therefore belongs in the Local Policy lists, not Centralized Policy.
Community Discussion (6 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option A is correct because the SD-WAN QoS workflow starts in the Local Policy section of vManage. Before a new queue can be used, the forwarding class (QoS class) must be mapped to a hardware output queue from Configuration > Policies > Custom Options > Lists under Localized Policy; this class-to-queue relationship tells the WAN edge which egress queue to use. The QoS map itself is then deployed to the WAN interface (typically VPN0), because that is the transport-facing egress point where scheduling, shaping, and congestion control protect business-critical traffic. This matches the Cisco SD-WAN design where QoS maps are localized and interface-specific, not part of the centralized fabric policy.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Options C and D place the class-to-queue list under the Centralized Policy section, which is wrong: centralized policies distribute fabric-wide constructs such as topology, VPN membership, and application-aware routing, while the class-to-hardware-queue list is a per-device Local Policy list. Option B has the correct Local Policy location but applies the QoS map to the service-side interface; service-side interfaces face the LAN or service VPN, so attaching the WAN QoS map there does not schedule traffic toward the transport. Option D also gets the WAN interface right but still fails because it uses the Centralized Policy section for the list. Therefore only A combines the correct Local Policy list location with the correct WAN interface application point.Community Comment Notes
The commenters overwhelmingly chose A, and their reasoning aligns with the official workflow. Networkchamp87 reasoned that it "would be a local policy so that rules out C,D" and that QoS is applied on the WAN interface because that is where the bottleneck is. Gycu summarized it as "QOS is created in Local policies and needs to be applied on the WAN interface," while Raynecore quoted the vManage path: "select Lists under Localized Policy" and "Select a required queue from the Queue drop-down." mikidvd51 dissented by asking why WAN and why Local, arguing that WAN traffic is IPsec-encrypted and that a new app may span many routers. The exam doctrine still favors A: SD-WAN QoS scheduling happens on the WAN-side egress before encryption, and the class-to-queue mapping is platform-specific, so it remains a Local Policy operation even when the application is deployed fabric-wide. hamidreza0010 also confirmed A, and Stanleymahamadi's bare "Correct « D »" has no supporting rationale that overrides the documented Local Policy/WAN interface workflow.Exam Strategy
In vManage QoS scenarios, first separate per-device hardware settings (Local Policy: class-to-queue, QoS map) from fabric-wide intent (Centralized Policy: topology, app-route). Then ask which interface faces the WAN transport, usually VPN0/WAN, because that is where egress scheduling and the QoS map are attached.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is the class-to-queue mapping done in Local Policy instead of Centralized Policy?
Queue mapping ties a forwarding class to a platform-specific hardware queue, so it is a per-device Local Policy list; Centralized Policy is for fabric-wide intent like topology and app-route.
Why is the QoS map applied to the WAN interface rather than the service-side interface?
The WAN interface (VPN0) is the transport egress where congestion and scheduling occur, so SD-WAN QoS maps are attached there; service-side QoS is LAN-facing and does not protect WAN transport.
Related Analysis
Practice All 300-415 Questions
Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full 300-415 Practice Test →