Which Component Creates a Feature Profile in Cisco SD-WAN UX 2.0?

Cisco SD-WAN Configuration

Answer Correct answer: C — Cisco SD-WAN UX 2.0 Configuration Groups are the structured component that creates and contains Feature Profiles, not Feature Parcels.

Which component creates a feature profile using a structured approach to configuring Cisco SD-WAN in UX 2.0?

feature template
feature parcel
configuration group Correct Answer
device template

cisco sd-wan ux 2.0 configuration groups feature profiles feature parcel feature profile cisco sdwan structured approach

Community Votes

55%

45%

55% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Community Insight

Tests the Cisco SD-WAN UX 2.0 hierarchy — Configuration Group creates Feature Profile, Feature Profile contains Feature Parcels — and the trap is treating the parcel as the creator.

Cisco SD-WAN UX 2.0 uses Configuration Groups as the structured way to create Feature Profiles, which in turn contain Feature Parcels. This page establishes that the correct component for creating a Feature Profile is the Configuration Group (C), not the Feature Parcel.

The most common wrong answer is Feature Parcel (B) because candidates see parcels listed as parts of a profile and assume they create it, but the parcel is a child building block, not the structured container.

Community Discussion (10 comments)

Outlaw_87 👍 5 Selected: B

Configuration Groups contain Feature Profiles, which are made up of Feature Parcels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhf-qXqUCkk

Rosh8787 👍 1

Option C is the correct answer. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/sdwan/configuration/config-groups/configuration-group-guide/using-config-groups.html

Rcont 👍 1 Selected: B

components that create a feature profile are feature parcels.

MARCOAKRAM 👍 2 Selected: B

Configuration Groups contain Feature Profiles, which are made up of Feature Parcels. So, the component creating a Feature Profile would be a Feature Parcel.

Networkchamp87 👍 2 Selected: C

outlaw_87 link perfectly describes this answer as Config groups. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhf-qXqUCkk

Gycu 👍 2 Selected: C

c - config groups

BECAUSE 👍 2 Selected: C

Answer is C check both links by kedir_ccnp and Outlaw_87 - Even though Outlaw_87 is saying its B if you watch the video its clear that the answer is C

dganeshonline 👍 2

Configuration Group is the correct answer

kedir_ccnp 👍 3 Selected: C

from the following link, https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/sdwan/configuration/system-interface/ios-xe-17/systems-interfaces-book-xe-sdwan/configuration-groups.html Configuration Groups and Feature Profiles: This feature provides a simple, reusable, and structured approach for the configurations in Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN. You can create a configuration group, that is, a logical grouping of features or configurations that is applied to one or more devices in the network that is managed by Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN. You can also create profiles based on features that are required, recommended, or uniquely used, and then combine the profiles to complete a device configuration. The configuration group workflow in Cisco SD-WAN Manager provides a guided method to create configuration groups and feature profiles.

abvga 👍 3 Selected: B

B is correct

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN UX 2.0 documentation describes Configuration Groups as providing a "simple, reusable, and structured approach" for configurations. A Configuration Group is a logical grouping of devices and Feature Profiles, so it is the component that creates and organizes a Feature Profile. Feature Profiles are in turn made up of Feature Parcels, which places the parcel below the profile in the hierarchy. The question's phrase "structured approach" therefore maps directly to the Configuration Group, making option C correct.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

A Feature Template (A) belongs to the older UX 1.0 workflow and is not the UX 2.0 structured construct. A Feature Parcel (B) is a child building block inside a Feature Profile, so it cannot be the component that creates the profile. A Device Template (D) is also a legacy per-device template approach, not the Configuration Group model introduced in UX 2.0.

Community Comment Notes

Learners split closely, with B receiving 55 votes and C 45, but several comments point beyond the raw poll. Outlaw_87 and MARCOAKRAM noted that "Configuration Groups contain Feature Profiles, which are made up of Feature Parcels," yet still chose B, which contradicts that hierarchy. kedir_ccnp and Rosh8787 cited Cisco Configuration Groups documentation, and BECAUSE observed that the linked material actually makes C the clear answer. As dganeshonline and Gycu also concluded, the Configuration Group is the structured component.

Official Reference

Exam Strategy

Map UX 2.0 components as Configuration Group > Feature Profile > Feature Parcel before answering. The exam often reverses the hierarchy so a lower-level parcel looks like the creator; read which component is described as the structured container.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is a feature parcel wrong if it builds a feature profile?

Feature parcels are the configuration blocks inside a feature profile; the Feature Profile itself is created and organized under a Configuration Group in UX 2.0.

Do feature templates still create profiles in Cisco SD-WAN UX 2.0?

No. Feature templates belong to the older UX 1.0 workflow; UX 2.0 uses Configuration Groups containing Feature Profiles built from Feature Parcels.

Related Analysis

Practice All 300-415 Questions

Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.

View Full 300-415 Practice Test →

← Back to 300-415 Study Guide