EIGRP VRF-Lite Configuration in Named Mode
Refer to the exhibit. [sampleXML/xmlfile-329_1.png] The IT router has been configured with the Science VRF and the interfaces have been assigned to the VRF. Which set of configurations advertises Science-1 and Science-2 routes using EIGRP AS 111?
Community Insight
The question tests the ability to correctly structure EIGRP commands when operating in named mode with VRFs, specifically avoiding the common trap of mixing classic AS numbers with named mode address-family statements.
This page explains the correct EIGRP configuration for advertising routes within a specific VRF using named mode syntax, highlighting the distinction between classic and named configuration structures.
Many learners select option A or B, mistakenly believing that 'router eigrp 111' defines the Autonomous System number even when 'address-family' is present, or they fail to recognize that the AS number must be defined inside the address-family block in named mode.
Community Discussion (18 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option D is the correct configuration because it adheres to Cisco's EIGRP named mode syntax. In named mode, the process name (e.g., '1') is assigned viarouter eigrp 1, and the Autonomous System number (111) is explicitly defined within the address-family ipv4 vrf Science block using the autonomous-system 111 command. This structure allows multiple VRFs to share the same EIGRP process while maintaining distinct AS numbers per VRF if needed.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Options A, B, and C attempt to use classic mode syntax (router eigrp 111) but then incorrectly mix in address-family blocks or omit necessary components. Specifically, Option A tries to set the autonomous system inside the address-family while also using the classic router command, which causes conflicts or errors as noted by community members. Option C uses pure classic mode without VRF context, failing to advertise into the Science VRF. Option B lacks the explicit autonomous-system definition required in the address-family block for proper operation in this context.Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly supports Option D. Users like 'bolbolskanes' and 'ChillingAgain' confirmed that D is correct because EIGRP named mode requires the process name to be separate from the AS number. One user ('bk989') highlighted a critical technical detail: attempting to userouter eigrp 111 followed by an address-family with the same AS can result in an error if the AS is already in use by a classic instance, reinforcing why the named mode structure in D is the robust and correct approach. Exam Strategy
Always distinguish between EIGRP Classic and Named modes. In Named mode, remember that the process name is arbitrary, and the Autonomous System number is configured under the address-family statement, not the initial router command.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why can't I use 'router eigrp 111' with address-family?
In named mode, the number after 'router eigrp' is just a process name. The actual Autonomous System number must be defined inside the address-family block to avoid conflicts and ensure correct VRF routing.
What is the difference between classic and named EIGRP config here?
Classic mode uses 'router eigrp <AS>' directly. Named mode separates the process name and AS number, allowing more granular control over VRFs and address families, as shown in option D.
Related Analysis
Practice All 300-410 Questions
Access 159 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full 300-410 Practice Test →