How to Make OSPF Area 1 Totally Stubby on R2
Refer to the exhibit. An engineer must ensure that R3 sees only type 1 and 2 LSAs in area 1. Which command must the engineer apply on R2? - 
Community Votes
76% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests the OSPF LSA filtering difference between stub, totally stubby, and NSSA areas; the trap is selecting area 1 stub because it blocks Type 4 and 5 LSAs but still floods Type 3 summaries into R3.
OSPF area 1 on R3 must see only Type 1 and Type 2 LSAs, which requires making it a totally stubby area from the ABR R2. This page confirms that the command area 1 stub no-summary (D) is correct, and explains why plain stub and NSSA options fail.
The most common wrong choice is B, area 1 stub, because many engineers assume stub already eliminates Type 3 LSAs; in reality only the no-summary keyword suppresses Type 3, Type 4, and Type 5 summaries.
Community Discussion (8 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The requirement is for R3 to receive only Type 1 (router) and Type 2 (network) LSAs in area 1, which means the ABR R2 must stop flooding Type 3 summary, Type 4 ASBR-summary, and Type 5 external LSAs into that area. The Cisco command area 1 stub no-summary configures area 1 as a totally stubby area on R2. A plain stub area only blocks Type 4 and Type 5 LSAs, so R3 would still see Type 3 summaries; adding no-summary suppresses them. Although the ABR injects a default inter-area route, the only non-default LSAs R3 sees are Type 1 and 2. Thus D is the command to apply on R2.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
A (area 1 nssa no-summary) creates a totally NSSA, which allows Type 7 LSAs and is intended for areas that inject external routes, so it does not meet the requirement of only Type 1 and 2 LSAs. B (area 1 stub) is a normal stub area and still permits Type 3 summary LSAs from R2. C (area 1 stub nssa) is an invalid combination because an area cannot be both stub and NSSA. D is the only option that makes area 1 totally stubby and filters out Type 3, 4, and 5 LSAs.Community Comment Notes
The community strongly favors D, with dapardo noting "stub No-Summary = totally stubby area." bk989 correctly explains that plain stub allows Type 1, 2, and 3 LSAs, while no-summary removes the Type 3 summaries. Sammy3637 adds that no-summary prevents Type 3, Type 4, and Type 5 LSAs, leaving only Type 1 and 2. A few voters chose B, likely because they forgot that a normal stub area still receives Type 3 summary LSAs. acg888 simply marked D as correct.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Remember that no-summary is configured on the ABR, while internal routers use plain area 1 stub; the question asks for R2, so choose the ABR command. Also map each area type to the LSA types it blocks: stub blocks 4 and 5, totally stubby blocks 3, 4, and 5, and NSSA blocks 4 and 5 but allows 7.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does area 1 stub no-summary still allow a default route into R3?
The ABR still injects one Type 3 default summary LSA, but it suppresses all other Type 3, 4, and 5 LSAs, so R3's LSDB contains mainly Type 1 and 2 plus the default.
Why is area 1 nssa no-summary wrong for this requirement?
NSSA no-summary allows Type 7 LSAs and is for areas redistributing external routes, so it cannot restrict area 1 to only Type 1 and 2 LSAs.
Related Analysis
Practice All 300-410 Questions
Access 159 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full 300-410 Practice Test →