How to Detect Unauthorized Credential Guessing Attempts?
A university employee logged on to the academic server and attempted to guess the system administrators’ log-in credentials. Which of the following security measures should the university have implemented to detect the employee’s attempts to gain access to the administrators’ accounts?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
This question tests your ability to distinguish between preventive and detective controls, with the common trap being the selection of two-factor authentication, which prevents but does not detect attacks.
Detecting unauthorized credential guessing requires robust logging mechanisms rather than preventive controls. The Security+ community consistently agrees that user activity logs are the correct solution for identifying and reviewing failed login attempts.
Two-factor authentication (A) is frequently chosen incorrectly because candidates confuse prevention with detection; while 2FA blocks unauthorized access, it does not generate records of brute-force or credential-guessing attempts.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
User activity logs capture authentication events, including multiple failed login attempts from a single source. By implementing centralized logging or monitoring these records, security teams can detect patterns indicative of credential stuffing or brute-force attacks. This aligns perfectly with the question’s explicit requirement to detect the attempts rather than stop them in real-time.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Two-factor authentication (A) is a preventive control that adds verification steps but does not log or alert on the initial guessing attempts. Firewalls (B) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (C) operate at the network layer to filter traffic and block known threats, making them ineffective for monitoring internal server authentication attempts. None of these options provide the audit trail necessary for forensic review or behavioral analysis.Community Comment Notes
Community members heavily emphasize the keyword “DETECT” as the primary differentiator between preventive and detective controls [1]. Multiple comments confirm that user activity logs specifically track failed logins, unusual behavior, and authentication events across systems like Event Viewer and Active Directory [2][3]. The consensus reinforces that logging is the foundational step for any incident response workflow before automated blocking occurs.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Always map control types to their function: prevent, detect, deter, or mitigate. When a question emphasizes identifying suspicious behavior after the fact, prioritize logging, SIEM, or auditing solutions over network or authentication barriers.
Related Analysis
Practice All SY0-701 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SY0-701 Practice Test →