Which attack used Mimikatz and an NTLM hash to access hardened PC?
An organization experienced a security breach that allowed an attacker to send fraudulent wire transfers from a hardened PC exclusively to the attacker's bank through remote connections. A security analyst is creating a timeline of events and has found a different PC on the network containing malware. Upon reviewing the command history, the analyst finds the following: PS>.\mimikatz.exe "sekurlsa::pth /user:localadmin /domain:corp-domain.com /ntlm:B4B9B02E1F29A3CF193EAB28C8D617D3F327 Which of the following best describes how the attacker gained access to the hardened PC?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The question tests identification of credential reuse attacks; the trap is overlooking that the NTLM hash in the Mimikatz command enables pass-the-hash, not fileless or LOLBin techniques.
A pass-the-hash attack with Mimikatz let the attacker authenticate as a shared support account using a captured NTLM hash. Community consensus confirms option B is correct.
Option C (living-off-the-land binaries) is a common wrong choice because it sounds evasive, but Mimikatz is a standalone tool, not a LOLBin; the hash reuse is the key indicator.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The command line shows Mimikatz usingsekurlsa::pth, which performs a pass-the-hash attack by injecting an NTLM hash into an authentication token. This allows the attacker to impersonate the localadmin account without knowing the plaintext password, exactly as described in option B. Commenter [1] notes Mimikatz extracts credentials from memory, and [2] explains that PTH uses a hashed password to authenticate.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A is unlikely because the attack uses on-premises credential theft, not fileless malware hosted by the banking platform. Option C is incorrect because Mimikatz is not a living-off-the-land binary; it is an external tool. Option D is plausible but not supported by the evidence, which shows a technical credential attack rather than social engineering.Community Comment Notes
All community comments agree on answer B, with the highest-liked comment (7 likes) defining Mimikatz and its credential-extraction capabilities. Another comment highlights that the NTLM hash in the command is the key evidence for pass-the-hash. No dissenting opinions were provided.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When analyzing attack timelines, map each command to its MITRE ATT&CK technique. Here, sekurlsa::pth is a clear indicator of pass-the-hash; rule out options that mention other threat categories or untargeted techniques.
Related Analysis
Practice All SY0-701 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SY0-701 Practice Test →