Which metric compares long-term risk transfer cost to risk impact?
Which of the following would be most useful in determining whether the long-term cost to transfer a risk is less than the impact of the risk?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The exam tests your understanding of quantitative risk metrics, and the common trap is confusing ALE with SLE or ARO instead of recognizing ALE as the annualized total that makes direct cost comparisons possible.
In Security+ SY0-701, the annualized loss expectancy (ALE) is the key metric for comparing the long-term cost of transferring a risk against the risk's expected financial impact. Community consensus strongly supports ALE because it factors in both frequency and single-event loss.
Choosing SLE (Single Loss Expectancy) is the most common mistake because it represents the impact of one risk event, but it does not account for how often the risk occurs, making it unsuitable for long-term cost comparisons.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
ALE (Annual Loss Expectancy) is the correct answer because it calculates the expected monetary loss over a full year by multiplying ARO (Annual Rate of Occurrence) by SLE (Single Loss Expectancy). This annualized figure provides a direct basis for comparing the long-term cost of transferring a risk—such as an insurance premium—against the risk's expected annual impact. As commenter [1] notes, ALE 'provides a clear picture of the financial impact of a risk over time.'Why the Other Options Are Wrong
ARO (A) only represents the frequency of a risk occurring and lacks the monetary impact component. RTO (B) and RPO (C) are recovery metrics unrelated to cost-benefit risk transfer decisions. SLE (E) measures the cost of a single loss event but does not account for frequency, so it cannot express long-term annualized cost. Only ALE combines both elements needed for a comprehensive cost comparison.Community Comment Notes
Community comments overwhelmingly favor D, with 100% of votes selecting ALE. Commenter [3] reinforces that ALE 'combines both the potential impact of a single event and the frequency of that event occurring to provide a comprehensive financial estimate.' Commenter [2] simply defines the acronyms, highlighting that candidates often need a clear understanding of each metric's role. These comments align with the Security+ objective on risk management and quantitative analysis.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When you see a question about comparing risk transfer costs, look for a metric that uses an annualized value—ALE is almost always the right choice. Remember the formula ALE = ARO × SLE to quickly distinguish it from the other options.
Related Analysis
Practice All SY0-701 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SY0-701 Practice Test →