Which MFA Solution Meets Know/Are/Have Without Extra Costs?
Short answer
D Mobile application-generated, one-time passcode with facial recognition
Question
Key Takeaways
It tests whether you recognize that modern smartphones already include native biometric scanners and free enterprise authenticator apps, satisfying the 'no purchased third-party applications' constraint while delivering stronger security than SMS-based alternatives.
This question evaluates your ability to map multi-factor authentication categories to practical, cost-effective deployments. The community consensus strongly favors mobile app-generated OTPs combined with biometrics, as they fulfill all three authentication factors using native smartphone features without requiring additional purchases.
Common mistake: Candidates frequently select SMS-based options because they misinterpret 'third-party applications' as requiring a purchase, overlooking that SMS is heavily discouraged by CompTIA due to SIM-swapping vulnerabilities and that native OS biometrics eliminate the need for extra hardware.
Expert Analysis
Core Concept: Authentication Factor Mapping
Multi-factor authentication (MFA) requires combining distinct credential categories: something you know (passwords/PINs), something you have (physical devices/tokens), and something you are (biometrics). The scenario mandates all three while explicitly prohibiting additional hardware costs or paid software licenses.
Why Option D is Correct
Option D pairs a mobile application-generated one-time passcode (OTP) with facial recognition. Modern smartphones ship with operating-system-level biometric scanners (e.g., FaceID, Windows Hello) that serve as native 'something you are' factors at no extra cost. Additionally, corporate authenticator apps are typically distributed free through enterprise portals or pre-installed, meaning they do not violate the 'no purchased third-party applications' rule. This configuration securely fulfills all three factors while aligning with CompTIA’s emphasis on scalable, budget-conscious IAM strategies.
Why Other Options Fall Short
- Option A specifies a smart card, which directly contradicts the prohibition on specialized hardware.
- Option B relies on security questions, which are inherently weak, easily researched, and lack a true 'something you are' component.
- Option C is the primary distractor. While SMS technically requires no new app, CompTIA consistently warns against SMS-based MFA due to SIM-swapping and interception risks. The community vote distribution (59% D vs 37% C) highlights a common trap regarding 'third-party applications,' but as noted by top-voted candidates, native smartphone features and free enterprise authenticators bypass this constraint entirely while providing significantly better security posture.
Official Reference
These links open the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
When analyzing MFA scenarios, immediately map each option to the three authentication factors before evaluating cost constraints. Remember that operating-system-native biometrics and vendor-provided free authenticator apps are treated as zero-cost deployments in CompTIA’s framework, making them strictly superior to legacy methods like SMS or security questions.
Community Votes
61% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 12 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 12
-
Anyio 👍 6 Answered DD. Mobile application-generated, one-time passcode with facial recognition Explanation: To meet the requirements of "something you know, are, and have" while avoiding additional costs for third-party apps or hardware: Something you know: Password or PIN. Something you have: A mobile device generating a one-time passcode. Something you are: Facial recognition (biometric verification). Option D leverages mobile devices employees already own, removing the need for specialized hardware or third-party applications while meeting the MFA criteria. Why not the other options? A: Smart cards require specialized hardware. B: Security questions are weak (easily guessed) and do not qualify as “something you are.” C: Voice verification systems often require additional infrastructure and are less practical compared to mobile solutions.
-
DaBulls 👍 4 Answered DD. Mobile application-generated, one-time passcode with facial recognition Why? Something you know → The password Something you have → The mobile device with the authentication app generating a one-time passcode (OTP) Something you are → Facial recognition NOT: C. Voice verification is unreliable, and SMS OTPs are vulnerable to SIM-swapping attacks.
-
ProudFather 👍 3 Answered CThis option best meets the company's requirements for an MFA solution that does not require third-party applications or specialized hardware: Something you know: Password Something you are: Voice and fingerprint verification Something you have: SMS one-time passcode
-
Fhaddad81 👍 3 Answered DMobile application-generated, one-time passcode with facial recognition
-
HQvRuss 👍 2 Answered DD. Mobile application-generated, one-time passcode with facial recognition Explanation: The company's MFA requirements include something you know, something you have, and something you are
Show 7 more comments
-
pierregates5 👍 2 Answered Cthe question states "without purchasing a third party application" so D is out of the question
-
csamuels71 👍 2 Answered CThis is wrong nothing states something you!!!
-
Aces155 👍 1 Answered CI think the answer is C. In both C and D, the something you have would have to be considered the phone you’re receiving the code on. I think D is incorrect because the question specifically says “does not require purchasing third party applications or specialized hardware.” While I use rsa and Microsoft Authenticator at work, both of which are free, i think specifically within the context of this question, D would be incorrect because it indicates the use of a third party application.
-
Bunaventi 👍 1 Answered DGPT: Both CompTIA and Cisco would recommend D. Mobile application-generated, one-time passcode with facial recognition as the best MFA solution. It meets the “know, are, and have” requirements while avoiding additional hardware or third-party application costs, making it secure, practical, and cost-effective.
-
Danny_Note 👍 1 Answered BB. The question specifies that the methods should include something you know and something you have. That means it can't be C or D which rely on something you are. Further, they don't want to buy extra hardware. That means option A is out because of smart cards. only B fits the description.
-
prabh1251 👍 1 Answered CD is incorrect - mobile application-generated passcode, which typically requires a third-party app like Google Authenticator or Microsoft Authenticator.. C is correct - No third-party app ✔️ ✅ No extra hardware ✔️ ✅ Covers "something you know, are, and have"
-
Nahidwin 👍 1 Answered CThe question is written very poorly , i think its C because it says without the need for purchasing a third party application , SMS don't require an application , anyway GREAT QUSTION COMPTIA !
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All SY0-701 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SY0-701 Practice Test →