Cloud Service Models for Outsourced Patching
While considering the organization's cloud-adoption strategy, the Chief Information Security Officer sets a goal to outsource patching of firmware, operating systems, and applications to the chosen cloud vendor. Which of the following best meets this goal?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer E. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
The core concept is the division of security responsibilities in cloud models. The common trap is assuming PaaS handles firmware or that IaaS/SaaS share OS patching equally; SaaS removes almost all management tasks from the customer.
This question tests understanding of cloud service models and the shared responsibility matrix. SaaS is the correct answer because it offers the highest level of abstraction, where the provider manages infrastructure, OS, and application patching.
Candidates often select PaaS (B), believing it covers application and OS patching. However, PaaS typically leaves the underlying infrastructure and firmware management to the provider but focuses on the platform layer, whereas SaaS extends this to include the application itself, making it the best fit for 'outsourcing' as described.
Community Discussion (8 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
SaaS (Software as a Service) represents the highest level of abstraction in cloud computing. In this model, the vendor is responsible for managing the entire stack: physical hardware, firmware, network, operating system, middleware, runtime, and data. By choosing SaaS, the organization outsources the patching of firmware, operating systems, and applications entirely to the vendor, aligning perfectly with the CISO's goal.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
PaaS (Platform as a Service) requires the customer to manage deployed applications and potentially some configuration settings, though the vendor handles the OS and runtime. IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) requires the customer to patch the guest OS and applications. Private and Community clouds are deployment models, not service models, and do not inherently define who performs the patching; they describe where the infrastructure resides. Containerization is a technology, not a service model, and does not dictate the patching responsibility boundary.Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly favors SaaS, with many users noting that it offloads the most responsibilities. One user pointed out that SaaS handles 'all aspects of the application environment,' including updates and patching. Another comment highlighted that while PaaS manages the OS, SaaS goes further by managing the application itself, which is key to the question's requirement of outsourcing application patching.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When a question asks about 'outsourcing' or 'managing' the widest range of components (especially down to firmware/OS), look for the service model with the least customer control. SaaS is always the answer for maximum vendor management of the stack.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does SaaS cover firmware patching?
Yes. In SaaS, the vendor manages the entire stack including physical hardware and firmware. The customer only accesses the software via a browser.
Why not PaaS for this goal?
PaaS requires the customer to manage the applications they deploy. SaaS includes the application layer, allowing full outsourcing of application patching.