Tracking Changes Between Software Deployments

Answer Correct answer: D — The organization should implement version control to track changes between software deployments.

An organization wants to ensure it can track changes between software deployments. Which of the following concepts should the organization implement?

  1. Continuous monitoring
  2. Rights management
  3. Non-repudiation
  4. Version control Correct Answer

Community Votes

D
100%

100% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Community Insight

The question tests knowledge of source code management tools versus general security concepts like non-repudiation.

Version control is the essential practice for monitoring and recording changes in software code. This page confirms it as the correct method for tracking deployment variations.

Learners often confuse version control with continuous monitoring, which focuses on system health rather than code history.

Community Discussion (4 comments)

fryderyk 👍 1 Selected: D
Version control
salah112 👍 2 Selected: D
D. Version control To ensure the ability to track changes between software deployments, the organization should implement version control. Version control, also known as source code management or revision control, is a system that tracks changes to source code, documentation, and other files, enabling teams to collaborate and manage different versions of software throughout its development lifecycle.
Jared77 👍 3 Selected: D
See question #229
Hs1208 👍 1 Selected: D
Version control systems (also known as source control or revision control systems) are designed to manage changes to source code, documents, and other files associated with a project.

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

Version control systems (VCS) are specifically designed to track modifications to files over time. By implementing a VCS, an organization can maintain a history of every change made to the codebase, allowing them to identify exactly what was modified between deployments and revert if necessary.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Continuous monitoring tracks system performance and security events in real-time, not historical code changes. Rights management controls access permissions but does not record edit histories. Non-repudiation ensures that a party cannot deny their actions, which is a legal/security outcome rather than a technical mechanism for tracking file versions.

Community Comment Notes

Community feedback strongly supports Version Control as the answer. Users emphasize that VCS allows teams to 'collaborate and manage different versions.' One commenter notes it is also known as 'source code management,' reinforcing its relevance to software development lifecycles.

Exam Strategy

Focus on the specific function of each term. If the question asks about 'tracking changes' or 'history', think Version Control. If it asks about 'real-time alerts', think Monitoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is continuous monitoring incorrect?

Continuous monitoring tracks system state and security events in real-time, whereas version control records historical changes to code files.

Does version control ensure non-repudiation?

While it provides an audit trail, non-repudiation is a broader security goal often achieved via digital signatures, not just version tracking.

Related Analysis

← Back to SY0-601 Study Guide