Mitigating Risk for Unpatchable Legacy SCADA Controllers
Short answer
A Isolate the controller from the rest of the network and constrain connectivity.
Question
Key Takeaways
The exam tests the hierarchy of risk controls, specifically highlighting that logical isolation (A) is preferred over simple quarantine (C) or internet blocking (D) when physical air-gapping isn't feasible.
This question addresses the best mitigation strategy for a legacy SCADA device with known vulnerabilities that cannot be patched or replaced. It establishes that network isolation is superior to quarantine or firewall-only rules for critical OT environments.
Common mistake: Many candidates choose Option C (Quarantine in a VLAN), confusing standard IT patching procedures with Operational Technology (OT) security requirements where strict connectivity constraints are necessary.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option A is correct because 'isolating' and 'constraining connectivity' directly addresses the lack of patchability by reducing the attack surface. In SCADA/OT environments, you must limit lateral movement while maintaining necessary operational communication. This approach effectively neutralizes the vulnerability without disrupting the critical utility service.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B is incorrect because removing the controller would halt the critical utility service, which is not an acceptable trade-off given the one-year timeline for replacement. Option C is insufficient because a VLAN used for patching implies broader network access and potential exposure to other threats; it does not constrain connectivity as strictly as isolation. Option D only blocks internet traffic but leaves the controller vulnerable to internal lateral movement attacks from compromised hosts within the municipal network.
Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly favors Option A, with users noting that 'Isolate = Air gap' in this context. One user noted they initially considered C but realized it was incorrect because there is no reason to put it in a patching VLAN. Another emphasized that isolating minimizes the impact on overall network security.
Exam Strategy
When dealing with legacy devices that cannot be patched, look for options that minimize the attack surface through isolation rather than just filtering specific ports. Remember that 'quarantine' often implies a temporary holding area with some network access, whereas 'isolation' implies strict separation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is quarantining in a VLAN (C) wrong for SCADA?
Can I just block internet access (D)?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 7 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 7
-
salah112 👍 3 Answered AA. Isolate the controller from the rest of the network and constrain connectivity. Given that the legacy controller cannot be upgraded, and a replacement is not available for at least a year, the best action to mitigate the risk posed by this controller is to isolate it from the rest of the network and constrain its connectivity. This approach minimizes the potential attack surface and limits the impact of vulnerabilities in the controller.
-
Gigi42 👍 2 Answered AThis question is similar to Q #815, where there was a legacy device with no support that had many vulnerabilities. Everyone chose Screened subnet and very few chose air gap. In this scenario, it pretty much says the same thing: legacy device with vulnerabilities, and now everyone is saying isolate. Isolate = Air gap
-
russian 👍 2 Answered AI first thought its C but its definitely A, no reason to quarantine it in a VLAN.
-
Hs1208 👍 1 Answered AA. Isolate the controller from the rest of the network and constrain connectivity. This helps minimize the potential impact of the vulnerabilities on the overall network security.
-
johnabayot 👍 1 Answered AA. This is an effective way to protect the legacy controller and the SCADA system until a replacement is available.
Show 2 more comments
-
ganymede 👍 1A. Isolate the controller from the rest of the network and constrain connectivity.
-
shady23 👍 1 Answered AIsolate the controller from the rest of the network and constrain connectivity.
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.