Cost-Effective Disaster Recovery Simulation Strategy
A company wants to find an affordable way to simulate a fail over of a critical application. The company does not currently have a solution for it. The application consists of 15 servers, and the company would like to simulate on production configurations and IP address schemes. Which of the following would be the most cost-effective solution?
Community Votes
50% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests the distinction between 'tabletop exercises' (discussion-based) and actual technical simulations, while balancing cost against the requirement to test IP schemes and server configurations.
The question asks for the most cost-effective way to simulate a failover using production configurations. Community consensus favors Cloud IaaS (Option B) as it offers affordable, on-demand infrastructure without the high capital expenditure of physical sites.
Candidates often choose Tabletop (Option E) because it is technically free or low-cost; however, tabletop exercises are discussion-based role-playing and do not involve actual system simulation or IP scheme validation.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Cloud IaaS (Option B) allows the organization to spin up temporary virtual servers that mirror production configurations and IP schemes without purchasing permanent hardware. This pay-as-you-go model makes it significantly more cost-effective than building and maintaining dedicated physical disaster recovery sites.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Warm sites (A) and Hot sites (C) require significant ongoing maintenance and hardware costs, making them expensive for a one-time simulation. Cold sites (D) lack pre-provisioned hardware, requiring time to install systems, which defeats the purpose of a quick simulation. Tabletop (E) is a discussion exercise, not a technical simulation of the application stack.Community Comment Notes
Comment [1] correctly highlights that 'simulation' implies technical execution, ruling out tabletop discussions. Comment [4] argues for E based on pure monetary cost but fails to meet the technical definition of simulating server and IP configurations provided in the CompTIA context.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When a question mentions 'simulation' involving technical components (like IPs or servers), eliminate discussion-only methods like Tabletop. Prioritize solutions that offer scalability and pay-per-use pricing (like Cloud IaaS) when 'cost-effective' is the primary constraint alongside technical requirements.
Related Analysis
Practice All SK0-005 Questions
Access 135 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SK0-005 Practice Test →