Collect remote experiment data with Snowcone and an FTP server on edge compute
A company needs to gather data from an experiment in a remote location that does not have internet connectivity. During the experiment, sensors that are connected to a local network will generate 6 TB of data in a proprietary format over the course of 1 week. The sensors can be configured to upload their data files to an FTP server periodically, but the sensors do not have their own FTP server. The sensors also do not support other protocols. The company needs to collect the data centrally and move the data to object storage in the AWS Cloud as soon as possible after the experiment. Which solution will meet these requirements?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Snowcone is a portable edge device that brings EC2 compute to the remote location, so an EC2 instance on the device can run the FTP server the sensors require, and the device is then returned to AWS so the data can be loaded into S3.
Sensors on a local network with no internet connectivity will generate 6 TB of proprietary-format data over one week, and the sensors can upload to an FTP server but have no FTP server of their own and support no other protocol. The data must be collected centrally and moved to S3 as soon as the experiment ends.
Using Snowball Edge with DataSync over NFS. The sensors cannot write to NFS, they can only upload over FTP, so there is no way to get the data onto the device's NFS export in the first place. Choosing Snowcone over Snowball Edge matters because Snowcone is the portable compute-optimized device for short-duration edge workloads.
Community Discussion (9 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The hard constraint is that the sensors speak only FTP and have no server, so something on the remote network must terminate FTP. AWS Snowcone is a portable edge computing device that includes an Amazon Linux 2 AMI, and an EC2 instance launched on the device sits on the same local network as the sensors, so an FTP server installed on that instance becomes the destination the sensors upload to. This keeps the sensors unchanged and works with no internet connectivity, because the devices only need local network reachability. After the week-long experiment, the device is returned to AWS so the 6 TB can be loaded into Amazon S3, and Snowcone is designed for precisely this pattern of short-duration portable edge compute with a modest data volume.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
A: Snowball Edge Compute Optimized is designed for edge workloads with higher local compute needs and longer deployments, and critically the sensors cannot write to NFS, so unloading data to the device over NFS as described is not something the sensors can do. B: The option returns the data as an Amazon EBS volume rather than loading it into S3, so it does not meet the object storage requirement, and it also invents a shell script pulling from each sensor when the sensors push to an FTP server. D: Snowcone does not provide Amazon FSx, and DataSync is not preinstalled on the device in the way described, so the configuration in the option does not exist. Even if it did, the sensors still need an FTP server to upload to, which the option never provides.Community Comment Notes
The community voted 100 to 0 for C, and the deciding argument repeated across several top comments is that the sensors support only FTP, so an FTP server must be installed on an EC2 instance on the Snowcone device. One dissenting comment favoured D for its DataSync automation, but it does not address the FTP requirement that every other answer turns on.Official Reference
Related Analysis
Practice All SAP-C02 Questions
Access 85 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SAP-C02 Practice Test →