Temporary disaster recovery to AWS with 5-minute RPO using Elastic Disaster Recovery
A company has developed an application that is running Windows Server on VMware vSphere VMs that the company hosts on premises. The application data is stored in a proprietary format that must be read through the application. The company manually provisioned the servers and the application. As part of its disaster recovery plan, the company wants the ability to host its application on AWS temporarily if the company's on-premises environment becomes unavailable. The company wants the application to return to on-premises hosting after a disaster recovery event is complete. The RPO is 5 minutes. Which solution meets these requirements with the LEAST amount of operational overhead?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery (DRS) delivers continuous replication with minute-level RPO and managed failover/failback, meeting the temporary-DR-and-return requirement with the least operational overhead.
A Windows app on VMware needs temporary AWS hosting during an on-prem outage with RPO 5 minutes and minimal overhead, then failback. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery provides continuous block-level replication to staging EC2, one-click failover, and failback to on-prem with low operational effort.
Using DataSync (Option A) or Storage Gateway (Option C) provides data movement but not the continuous replication, automated failover, and failback that DRS offers for a true DR posture.
Community Discussion (10 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option B configures AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, which performs continuous block-level replication to staging EC2 instances with an RPO of seconds to minutes (meeting the 5-minute RPO). DRS provides managed failover to launch EC2 from replicated volumes and failback to on-prem, with low operational overhead — ideal for temporary DR that returns home.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A uses DataSync to replicate to EBS and relies on manual CloudFormation-launched EC2, lacking continuous replication and automated failback. Option C uses a file gateway and AWS Backup, unsuitable for a proprietary-format app that must run on EC2. Option D uses FSx for Windows, which stores data in FSx rather than enabling EC2-based failover of the application.Community Comment Notes
The community vote is strongly B (94). TonytheTiger links the DRS failback overview documentation. Dgix notes DataSync lacks comprehensive DR capability, reinforcing B.Official Reference
Related Analysis
Practice All SAP-C02 Questions
Access 85 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SAP-C02 Practice Test →