AWS Control Tower and Security Hub for Centralized Audit
Short answer
A Deploy an AWS Control Tower environment in the Organizations management account with AWS Security Hub enabled.
Question
Key Takeaways
The core concept is leveraging AWS Control Tower's Landing Zone capabilities in the management account to enforce guardrails and integrate Security Hub for automated FSBP compliance checks, minimizing operational overhead.
This question evaluates the use of AWS Control Tower combined with AWS Security Hub to achieve centralized auditing and compliance monitoring across an AWS Organization.
Common mistake: Candidates often select Option B, mistakenly deploying Control Tower in a member account instead of the management account, or Option D, which lacks the centralized governance features of Control Tower.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option A is correct because AWS Control Tower is designed to be deployed in the AWS Organizations management account to create a secure, multi-account environment (Landing Zone). By enabling AWS Security Hub within this environment, the company can automatically aggregate security findings and check compliance against the AWS Foundational Security Best Practices (FSBP) standard across all accounts. This setup provides centralized logging, monitoring, and account creation (via Account Factory) with minimal manual effort, satisfying the 'least operational overhead' requirement.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option B is incorrect because AWS Control Tower must be deployed in the management account, not a dedicated member account, to effectively govern the entire organization. Option C and D involve AWS Managed Services (AMS), which is a managed service provider offering, not a native self-service AWS feature that minimizes internal operational overhead as requested; additionally, AMS Accelerate is typically used for migration, not ongoing governance automation like Control Tower.
Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly favors Option A. As user LeonSauveterre noted, "Control Tower enforces centralized logging, monitoring, and account management," while correctly identifying that B deviates from best practices by using a member account. User Kezuko also provided a direct link to AWS documentation confirming the integration between Control Tower and Security Hub controls.
Official Reference
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/controltower/latest/userguide/security-hub-controls.html
This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
Always identify the deployment target for foundational services like AWS Control Tower; it must reside in the management account. Look for keywords like 'least operational overhead' and 'compliance' which point towards integrated, managed solutions like Control Tower + Security Hub rather than custom scripts or third-party services.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why not deploy Control Tower in a member account?
Does Security Hub replace GuardDuty?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 7 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 7
-
Kezuko 👍 4 Answered Ahttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/controltower/latest/userguide/security-hub-controls.html
-
FlyingHawk 👍 2 Answered AThis question was in my today's exam.
-
LeonSauveterre 👍 1 Answered AA - Control Tower enforces centralized logging, monitoring, and account management. Security Hub monitors compliance with AWS Foundational Security Best Practices (FSBP). Account Factory simplifies the creation of new accounts with preconfigured settings. B - Control Tower is intended to be deployed in the management account, not a member account, which deviates from AWS-recommended practices. C - GuardDuty focuses on security threats rather than compliance monitoring for FSBP. D - AMS Accelerate is more suitable for enterprises with highly complex requirements. Also, more operational overheads and cost more, but the question wants "to prevent additional work and to minimize costs".
-
kempes 👍 4 Answered AOption A
-
asdfcdsxdfc 👍 2 Answered AA is correct
Show 2 more comments
-
LuongTo 👍 1Why not B?
-
Ipergorta 👍 1Option D
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All SAA-C03 Questions
Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SAA-C03 Practice Test →