FSx for NetApp ONTAP Multi-Protocol Access
Short answer
B Create an Amazon FSx for ONTAP instance with auto-tiering to support SMB and NFS access from EC2 instances.
Question
Key Takeaways
The common trap is choosing S3 File Gateway (C) due to its cost-efficiency, but it fails to meet the requirement for direct EC2-to-storage protocol access within the same region as efficiently as managed file systems.
This question tests the selection of a storage solution supporting both SMB and NFS protocols with intelligent tiering. The correct answer is B, as FSx for NetApp ONTAP provides native multi-protocol access and automatic tiering for EC2 instances.
Common mistake: Many candidates choose C because S3 Intelligent-Tiering addresses the access pattern, ignoring that S3 File Gateway adds operational overhead and latency compared to a native file system for mixed protocol workloads.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Option B is the correct choice because Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP natively supports both SMB and NFS protocols, allowing Windows, Mac, and Linux EC2 instances to access data seamlessly. It includes an auto-tiering policy that automatically moves infrequently accessed data to lower-cost storage tiers, satisfying the access pattern requirements with minimal operational overhead.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A is incorrect because Amazon EFS does not support SMB; it only supports NFS. Option D is incorrect because Amazon FSx for OpenZFS primarily supports NFS and POSIX, lacking native SMB support required for Windows clients. Option C involves AWS Storage Gateway, which acts as a bridge between on-premises and cloud or specific hybrid scenarios; while it can expose S3 via SMB/NFS, it introduces additional management layers and potential latency compared to a fully managed native file system like FSx for ONTAP for in-region EC2 access.
Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly favors B, noting that FSx for ONTAP is the only option providing full multi-protocol support (SMB, NFS, iSCSI) out-of-the-box. Some users argued for C, stating it has 'least operational overhead,' but experts clarify that managing a gateway appliance adds more overhead than a managed file system service. Comments highlight that EFS and OpenZFS cannot serve Windows clients via SMB, eliminating them immediately.
Official Reference
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/NetAppONTAPGuide/
This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
When a question specifies multiple file access protocols (SMB and NFS), immediately eliminate services that do not support all specified protocols. For mixed OS environments requiring file-level access, prefer managed file systems like FSx over object storage gateways unless hybrid connectivity is explicitly required.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why not use S3 File Gateway for least overhead?
Does EFS support SMB protocol?
Community Votes
80% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 15 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 15
-
ogerber 👍 18 Answered BAmazon FsX for NetAPP ONTAP feature: Multi-protocol access to data using the Network File System (NFS), Server Message Block (SMB), and Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) protocols
-
jaswantn 👍 7option C .... SMB and NFS storage protocols ->S3 file gateway
-
hajra313 👍 5Option A and D do not support SMB and NFS file system . Option b looks correvt
-
Linuslin 👍 4 Answered BAmazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP provides fully managed shared storage in the AWS Cloud with the popular data access and management capabilities of ONTAP. Move workloads running on NetApp or other NFS/SMB/iSCSI servers to AWS without modifying application code or how you manage data. And FsX for NetAPP ONTAP support "Reducing storage costs with automatic and intelligent storage tiering." https://aws.amazon.com/tw/fsx/netapp-ontap/faqs/#product-faqs#netapp-ontap-faq#reducing-storage-costs-with-automatic-and-intelligent-storage-tiering
-
TwinSpark 👍 3 Answered BFSx for ONTAP support NFS and SMB Protocol, even AWS Storage Gateway Amazon S3 File Gateway support them but it is used to connect on premises devices to file on s3, not to connect ec2 instances in the same aws region
Show 10 more comments
-
Indrasis 👍 3 Answered COption C looks correct. "The company will access a portion of the data routinely. The company will access the remaining data infrequently."
-
alawada 👍 2 Answered BAmazon FsX for NetAPP ONTAP feature: Multi-protocol access to data using the Network File System (NFS), Server Message Block (SMB), and Internet Small Computer Systems Interface (iSCSI) protocols Option C: make no sense I see it as a distractor
-
Kezuko 👍 2 Answered CBoth B and C works, but it seems like C has a least operational overhead
-
TruthWS 👍 2B - FSx for ONTAP support SMB and NFS
-
rjjkc 👍 1 Answered CI think it is "C" Not "B" - The question never indicates the company is using "NetApp ONTAP file systems", so I am not sure what it means by "Migrate the data to the FSx for ONTAP volume". Please correct if misunderstood. "C" clearly indicates how to migrate the data to S3, the S3 Intelligent-Tiering addressed the access pattern in the question and you can SMB/NFS mount S3 bucket https://docs.aws.amazon.com/filegateway/latest/files3/using-smb-fileshare.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/filegateway/latest/files3/GettingStartedAccessFileShare.html
-
Andy_09 👍 1Option with S3 usage looks corrcet
-
MattBJ 👍 3 Answered CC is correct
-
Scheldon 👍 2 Answered BAnswer B
-
Appon 👍 2 Answered Boption B
-
camps 👍 1it's C
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All SAA-C03 Questions
Access 120 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full SAA-C03 Practice Test →