Next Step After Capturing NTLMv2 Hashes with Responder

During the reconnaissance phase, a penetration tester runs the following command: sudo responder -I tun0 The result of the command is a list of NTLMv2 hashes. Which of the following should the penetration tester do next?

  1. Use the hash in a password spraying attack.
  2. Use the hashes in a collision attack.
  3. Attempt to pass the hash with CrackMapExec.
  4. Crack the hash with Hashcat. Source Reference Answer

Community Votes

D
71%
C
29%

71% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Community Insight

The exam tests the difference between NTLM hashes (usable for pass-the-hash) and NTLMv2 challenge-response hashes (must be cracked offline). The common trap is assuming all captured hashes can be used for pass-the-hash.

In CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-002, capturing NTLMv2 hashes with Responder during reconnaissance typically leads to cracking them with Hashcat, as these hashes cannot be directly used in pass-the-hash attacks.

Choosing C (pass the hash with CrackMapExec) is the most common mistake because testers often confuse NTLM hashes with NTLMv2 hashes. NTLMv2 includes a challenge-response component that prevents direct pass-the-hash reuse.

Community Discussion (3 comments)

kinny4000 👍 1 Selected: D
The NTLMv2 hash cannot be used in a Pass-the-Hash (PtH) attack directly because it includes a challenge-response mechanism.
Snagggggin 👍 4 Selected: D
D is correct.
Snagggggin 👍 2 Selected: C
I would argue that passing the hash is much quicker and there is no guarantee the hash can be cracked. I believe it would be better to first attempt passing the hash and getting into the machine, if unsuccessful then you can easily pivot to cracking the hash.

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

Responder captures NTLMv2 hashes, which are challenge-response based and cannot be directly replayed in a pass-the-hash attack. The recommended next step is to crack the hash offline using a tool like Hashcat, which can attempt to recover the plaintext password. This aligns with the typical penetration testing workflow: gather credentials, crack them, then use the recovered password for lateral movement or further attacks.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option C (pass the hash with CrackMapExec) is incorrect because NTLMv2 hashes require a challenge-response interaction; they cannot be used directly as NTLM hashes. Option B (collision attack) is irrelevant; hashcat cracking uses brute force or dictionary attacks, not cryptographic collisions. Option A (password spraying) is not the immediate next step; spraying is a separate attack that uses known passwords, not the harvested hash itself.

Community Comment Notes

Comment [2] correctly explains why pass-the-hash fails for NTLMv2, a key technical distinction. Comment [1] argues for pass-the-hash first due to speed, but this is operationally risky and not the best exam answer because the hash type is not compatible. Comment [3] simply agrees with D, reflecting the majority consensus among test-takers.

Official Reference

Exam Strategy

When a question mentions NTLMv2 hashes, remember that they need to be cracked first, not passed. Distinguish between NTLM and NTLMv2: NTLM can be used for pass-the-hash, while NTLMv2 requires offline cracking with Hashcat or John the Ripper.

Related Analysis

← Back to PT0-002 Study Guide