Which Vertex AI services track and compare model versions across projects?

You are training models in Vertex AI by using data that spans across multiple Google Cloud projects. You need to find, track, and compare the performance of the different versions of your models. Which Google Cloud services should you include in your ML workflow?

  1. Dataplex, Vertex AI Feature Store, and Vertex AI TensorBoard
  2. Vertex AI Pipelines, Vertex AI Feature Store, and Vertex AI Experiments
  3. Dataplex, Vertex AI Experiments, and Vertex AI ML Metadata
  4. Vertex AI Pipelines, Vertex AI Experiments, and Vertex AI Metadata Source Reference Answer

Community Votes

D
56%
C
25%
B
19%

56% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Community Insight

This question tests your ability to distinguish services that directly support experiment tracking and lineage from data-management or feature-engineering tools. The common trap is selecting Dataplex for its multi-project data capabilities, even though it does not handle model version tracking or performance comparison.

To track and compare model versions in Vertex AI across multiple Google Cloud projects, the recommended combination is Vertex AI Pipelines, Vertex AI Experiments, and Vertex AI ML Metadata. The exam community most strongly supports option D over alternatives that incorrectly include Dataplex or Feature Store.

The most common wrong answer is C (Dataplex, Vertex AI Experiments, and Vertex AI ML Metadata). Test-takers choose it because Dataplex centralizes data across projects, but Dataplex is a data governance platform, not an ML workflow orchestrator. Without Vertex AI Pipelines, the workflow lacks structured orchestration for training, tracking, and comparing model runs.

Community Discussion (8 comments)

fitri001 👍 5 Selected: D
Why not the others? A. Dataplex & Vertex AI Feature Store: While Dataplex can manage data across projects, it's not directly tied to model versioning and comparison. Feature Store focuses on feature engineering, not model version management. B. Vertex AI Feature Store & Vertex AI TensorBoard: Similar to option A, Feature Store isn't directly involved in model version tracking, and TensorBoard is primarily for visualizing training data and metrics, not model version comparison across projects. C. Dataplex & Vertex AI ML Metadata: Dataplex, as mentioned earlier, doesn't directly address model version comparison. While ML Metadata tracks lineage, it might not have the experiment management features of Vertex AI Experiments.
Umanga 👍 1 Selected: C
Ans : C 1. Dataplex : https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/model-registry/introduction#search_and_discover_models_usings_service 2. Vertex AI Experiments: This service is crucial for tracking and comparing the performance of different model versions. It allows you to: Run multiple training experiments with different configurations. Track experiment metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, etc. Compare the performance of different model versions trained in various projects. 3. Vertex AI Metadata: This service provides a centralized view of your ML workflow, including model lineage and versioning. It's particularly helpful in your scenario because:
Aastha_Vashist 👍 2 Selected: D
went with D
Yan_X 👍 2 Selected: D
I would go with option D. No Vertex AI pipeline no orchestration. So rule out A and C. Vertex AI Metadata is for 'spans across multiple Google Cloud projects' data used by the model.
Carlose2108 👍 1
Why not Option D?
guilhermebutzke 👍 2 Selected: B
My Answer: B Vertex AI Pipelines: to create, deploy, and manage ML pipelines, which are essential for orchestrating your ML workflow, especially when dealing with data spanning multiple projects. Vertex AI Feature Store: It's crucial for managing feature data across different projects. Vertex AI Experiments: track and compare the performance of different versions of your models, enabling you to experiment Why not the other: Dataplex: not specifically tailored for managing ML workflows or model training. Vertex AI ML metadata: not sufficient on its own to cover all aspects of managing the ML workflow across multiple projects. Vertex AI TensorBoard: not specifically designed for managing the end-to-end ML workflow or tracking model versions across multiple projects.
SKDE 👍 1 Selected: B
Dataplex works well with the data across projects and even on-prem, but doesn't work well with the ML related data like tracking and performance. So options A and C are considered wrong. Metadata is to store metadata. So it is not required while we consider to compare the model performance. So option D is wrong. On the other hand Feature store brings meaningful data for comparing the Models performance based on feature data. So Option B is correct
b1a8fae 👍 3 Selected: C
I go with C. Dataplex to centralize different Google projects. Vertex AI experiments + ML Metadata to track experiment lineage, parameter usage etc and compare models.

Comments & Corrections

No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Expert Analysis

Why the Answer Is Correct

Option D is correct because it includes the three services that work together for end-to-end ML workflow tracking and comparison. Vertex AI Pipelines orchestrates the training steps, Vertex AI Experiments records parameters and metrics for each run, and Vertex AI ML Metadata stores detailed lineage information—allowing you to find, compare, and audit model versions across projects. This combination directly addresses the need to track and compare model performance.

The suggested answer aligns with the official Google Cloud MLOps pattern. Pipelines provide reproducible workflows, Experiments offer a simple way to log and compare runs, and Metadata captures artifacts and lineage across the entire lifecycle. Together, they form the backbone for 'find, track, and compare' requirements, especially complex multi-project environments.

Why the Other Options Are Wrong

Option A is wrong because Dataplex is a data management and governance service, not an ML experiment tracker. Vertex AI Feature Store manages feature definitions and serving, but it does not log or compare model versions. TensorBoard is a visualization tool, but without Experiments and Metadata, it cannot provide the structured comparison of versions required by the question.

Option B is also incorrect because it includes Feature Store instead of ML Metadata. Feature Store is for feature reuse and consistency, not for storing model run lineage. While Pipelines and Experiments are essential, the absence of ML Metadata means you lose the critical link between runs, artifacts, and parameters, which is necessary for detailed 'find and track' capabilities.

Option C is the most competitive, but it replaces Pipelines with Dataplex. Dataplex is useful for centralizing data across projects, but it does not orchestrate ML workflows. The question's focus on model version tracking and comparison demands Pipelines for workflow automation and reproducibility. Without Pipelines, the combination remains a data-focused solution rather than an ML workflow solution.

Community Comment Notes

Community members with the most upvoted comments favored D. One commenter (likes=5) explained that neither Dataplex nor Feature Store is directly tied to model versioning and comparison, and that TensorBoard alone is insufficient. Another commenter (likes=2) noted, 'Vertex AI Metadata is for spans across multiple Google Cloud projects data used by the model,' reinforcing that Metadata handles the cross-project lineage requirement.

Some test-takers argued for C, pointing to Dataplex's ability to centralize different projects and ML Metadata's tracking. However, the higher-vote comments correctly identified that Pipelines is a core orchestration component in the ML workflow. The debate hinges on whether 'ML workflow' implies Pipelines—most experienced exam takers agree it does. One commenter (likes=1) incorrectly dismissed Metadata as unnecessary, but Metadata is essential for artifact and parameter lineage, especially when tracking across projects.

Official Reference

Exam Strategy

When asked about tracking and comparing model versions, immediately think of the MLOps trio: Pipelines (orchestration), Experiments (run comparison), and ML Metadata (lineage). If a question mentions data spanning multiple projects, do not confuse data governance services like Dataplex with ML workflow components; evaluate each option against the exact phrase 'track and compare model versions.'

Related Analysis

Practice All PMLE Questions

Access 65 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.

View Full PMLE Practice Test →

← Back to PMLE Study Guide