Which Attack Impacts a Web-Based Customer Portal's Availability?

N10-009 By islever Editorial Last updated

Summarize various types of attacks and their impact to the network.

Short answer

C A denial-of-service (DoS) attack exhausts the web-based customer portal's bandwidth, connections, CPU, or memory so legitimate customers cannot access it.

Question

Which of the following impacts the availability of a web-based customer portal?
  1. MAC flooding
  2. ARP spoofing
  3. DoS Correct Answer
  4. Rouge devices

Key Takeaways

It tests the CIA availability impact of a DoS attack, and the main trap is choosing attacks such as ARP spoofing or MAC flooding that disrupt a local network or enable interception rather than directly overwhelming the portal service.

This Network+ question asks which attack directly reduces the availability of a web-based customer portal; the correct answer is C, a DoS attack. It contrasts direct service resource exhaustion with local network disruption, interception and unauthorized devices.

Common mistake: A common wrong answer is B, ARP spoofing, because it can disrupt traffic and look like an availability issue; however, it primarily enables man-in-the-middle interception on a local segment rather than exhausting the web portal's resources.

Expert Analysis

The boundary: service availability vs. local disruption

This question asks which option impacts the availability of a web-based customer portal, not which option can cause any kind of network trouble. Availability here means legitimate customers can reach and use the portal. The decisive test is whether the attack directly consumes the portal's service resources — bandwidth, TCP connections, CPU, memory or application worker capacity — or merely disrupts a local segment, enables interception, or introduces an unauthorized device.

Why C is the direct answer

C. DoS sits on the service-availability side of that boundary. A denial-of-service attack targets the portal with excessive requests or traffic until the service cannot respond to real users. The supplied reasoning makes the same point: DoS is designed to overwhelm a target with traffic or requests, exhausting resources so the portal becomes inaccessible.

Why the other options cross a different boundary

A. MAC flooding exhausts a switch's CAM table and can cause flooding or local degradation, but its focus is Layer 2 forwarding, not the portal's application resources. B. ARP spoofing is primarily a man-in-the-middle technique; it threatens confidentiality and integrity by poisoning ARP mappings, even if disruption follows. D. Rogue devices (written "Rouge" in the option) are unauthorized endpoints or access points; they create policy and access-control risk, not a direct resource-exhaustion attack on the portal.

Exam takeaway

When an option list mixes attack types, map each one to the CIA triad and its scope. For an explicit availability question about a public web service, choose the attack that directly denies the service: C. DoS.

Official Reference

These links open the official vendor documentation in a new tab.

Exam Strategy

When an attack question asks about availability, map each option to the CIA triad and to its scope before selecting. Ask whether the option directly consumes the named service's resources or instead disrupts a local segment, enables interception, or introduces unauthorized access. For a public web portal, the direct resource-exhaustion choice is DoS, not Layer 2 flooding or ARP poisoning.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is ARP spoofing not the answer when it can disrupt a customer portal?

ARP spoofing mainly enables man-in-the-middle interception on a local network and threatens confidentiality or integrity. It does not directly exhaust the portal's service resources the way a DoS attack does.

Can MAC flooding make a web portal unavailable?

It can degrade a local switch segment by exhausting the CAM table and causing flooding, but the question asks about directly impacting the portal's availability. That aligns with a DoS attack on the service, not a Layer 2 forwarding attack.

What makes a rogue device different from a DoS attack?

A rogue device is unauthorized hardware such as an access point or endpoint, creating access-control and policy risk. A DoS attack deliberately consumes resources to deny service to legitimate users.

More N10-009 FAQ →

Discussion 1 contributions

Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.

From public community threads 1

  1. ERB14 👍 1 Answered C
    A Denial of Service (DoS) attack is specifically designed to overwhelm a target server or system with excessive traffic or requests. This exhausts system resources (such as bandwidth, CPU, or memory), rendering the web-based customer portal inaccessible or unavailable to legitimate users.

Reader comments & corrections

No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

Submitted for moderation before publishing. Keep it helpful and respectful.

Practice All N10-009 Questions

Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.

View Full N10-009 Practice Test →

← Back to N10-009 Study Guide