Which technology prevents loss of connection between a virtual server and network storage?
Which of the following technologies would MOST likely be used to prevent the loss of connection between a virtual server and network storage devices?
Community Votes
80% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
This question tests your ability to distinguish storage-specific redundancy (multipathing) from generic network redundancy mechanisms; the trap is choosing VRRP or NIC teaming because they also provide 'failover' but in different contexts.
Multipathing is the correct answer because it maintains a constant connection between a virtual server and storage by using multiple physical paths to the storage array. The CompTIA community strongly favors option A, and VMware documentation confirms multipathing as the standard solution for storage path redundancy.
The most common wrong answer is VRRP (option B) because it is a redundancy protocol, but VRRP provides automatic failover for the default gateway IP on routers, not redundant paths to storage devices; multipathing is the storage-specific solution.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Multipathing uses multiple physical paths between a host and an external storage device to transfer data. If one path fails due to a SAN switch, HBA, cable, or storage port problem, another path can take over, preventing loss of connection. This directly matches the scenario of a virtual server connecting to network storage.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
VRRP is designed for IP router redundancy and default gateway failover, not storage path failover, so it does not prevent loss of connection to storage arrays. Port aggregation (e.g., LACP) combines multiple physical links into a single logical link to increase bandwidth or provide link redundancy at the switch level, but it is not multipathing and does not provide SCSI-level path failover to storage. NIC teaming groups multiple network adapters for host network redundancy, but it is not specifically designed for storage multipathing and generally operates at the IP layer rather than the storage protocol layer.Community Comment Notes
The community vote and comments overwhelmingly favor A. Comment 1 explains that multipathing provides multiple physical pathways to storage, ensuring data access continues if one path fails. Comment 2 provides an official VMware link that explicitly supports multipathing for maintaining a constant connection between a host and storage. Comment 3 incorrectly suggests VRRP, but the wording shows VRRP handles router availability, not storage connectivity.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Look for keywords like 'virtual server' and 'network storage' — those point to storage path redundancy, so multipathing should be your first instinct. Remember that protocols like VRRP, LACP, and NIC teaming are about network-level redundancy and bandwidth, while multipathing is specifically for storage device connections.