Adding InherentPermissions = 'RI' to a table object grants Read and Insert permissions and resolves permission errors, blocked posting, and list-page access without a new permission set
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. A company creates a Business Central app and a table named MyTable to store records when sales orders are posted. Users report the following issues: • The users receive permission errors related to MyTable. • Users are no longer able to post sales orders since installing the new app. • The users cannot access the list page created in MyTable. You need to resolve the user issues without creating new permission sets. You must use the principle of least privilege. Solution: In the MyTable object, add the property InherentPermissions = RI. Does the solution meet the goal?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer A. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
InherentPermissions is the mechanism to embed the minimum needed permissions directly on the object. Because it does not create a new permission set, it meets the explicit constraint in the question.
The InherentPermissions property on a table object lets the table grant permissions to itself, following the principle of least privilege without requiring a separate permission set. The value 'RI' grants Read and Insert, which covers the listed issues: reading the table, inserting sales order records, and opening the list page.
Do not assume a single permission letter is enough; the issues include both reading and inserting, so the value must include both R and I. Also avoid creating a new permission set, which the question forbids.
Community Discussion (3 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.