MPLS-TP OAM Alarm Suppression Packets

H31-341-V2.5 By islever Editorial Last updated

MPLS & PWE3

Short answer

BC AIS and FDI packets are used in MPLS and MPLS-TP OAM to suppress downstream alarms.

Question

In MPLS OAM and MPLS-TP OAM, which of the following packets support alarm suppression? (Choose all that apply.)
  1. CC
  2. AIS Correct Answer
  3. FDI Correct Answer
  4. BDI

Key Takeaways

This question tests the specific MPLS-TP OAM packets responsible for alarm suppression, trapping learners who might confuse backward notification (BDI) or defect detection (CC) with forward defect suppression.

In MPLS and MPLS-TP OAM, AIS and FDI packets are used to suppress downstream alarms caused by an upstream fault, while BDI and CC serve other purposes.

Common mistake: Selecting BDI because it is a defect indication packet, failing to recognize that BDI notifies the upstream end of a fault rather than suppressing downstream alarms.

Expert Analysis

Alarm Suppression Principle: In MPLS and MPLS-TP OAM, alarm suppression is a critical mechanism to prevent a single upstream fault from flooding the network with cascading alarms from downstream nodes. When a fault is detected, specific OAM packets are generated and sent downstream to inform subsequent nodes that the defect is already known, thereby suppressing secondary alarms at downstream Maintenance Entity Group (MEG) endpoints.

AIS and FDI Roles: The Alarm Indication Signal (AIS) and Forward Defect Indication (FDI) packets both serve this forward-direction suppression purpose. Option B (AIS) is the traditional and most common packet used to suppress downstream alarms following a signal fail or degrade condition. Option C (FDI) operates similarly, carrying defect type and location information forward to suppress alarms. In many ITU-T standards, AIS is considered a specific type of FDI, making both correct choices for alarm suppression.

BDI and CC Functions: Option D (BDI) is the Backward Defect Indication packet, which is sent in the opposite direction—upstream—to notify the source of the failure, allowing for fault localization or protection switching at the remote end, but it does not suppress alarms. Option A (CC) represents Continuity Check packets, which are used proactively to detect loss of continuity (LOC) defects; they are the source of defect detection, not the mechanism for alarm suppression.

Community Corroboration: Community input correctly identifies AIS and FDI as the alarm suppression packets, explicitly noting that BDI is used to send fault indicators upstream to notify the remote end rather than to suppress alarms.

Official Reference

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6374

This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.

Exam Strategy

When asked about OAM alarm suppression in transport networks, immediately associate it with forward-direction defect indicators (AIS, FDI). Backward indicators (BDI) are for upstream notification, and proactive checks (CC) are for defect detection. Grouping OAM packets by their directional purpose (forward vs. backward, detection vs. suppression) prevents mixing their functions on the exam.

Community Votes

B
50%
C
50%

50% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.

Discussion 1 contributions

Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.

From public community threads 1

  1. ethassan 👍 1
    AIS and FDI. BDI is not used to suppress the alarm, instead it is used to send fault indicators upstream to notify the remote end of a local failure.

Reader comments & corrections

No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.

Log in to comment, report an error, or add a note about this question.

← Back to H31-341-V2.5 Study Guide