Using EXPLAIN vs DESCRIBE HISTORY for Delta Table Maintenance
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a Fabric tenant that contains a lakehouse named Lakehouse1. Lakehouse1 contains a Delta table named Customer. When you query Customer, you discover that the query is slow to execute. You suspect that maintenance was NOT performed on the table. You need to identify whether maintenance tasks were performed on Customer. Solution: You run the following Spark SQL statement: EXPLAIN TABLE customer - Does this meet the goal?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
This question tests the difference between Spark SQL execution plan commands and Delta Lake history commands; the common trap is confusing EXPLAIN with DESCRIBE HISTORY.
The EXPLAIN statement in Spark SQL is used to display the execution plan of a query, not the maintenance history of a Delta table. This page establishes that using EXPLAIN does not meet the goal of identifying past maintenance tasks.
Choosing 'Yes' because EXPLAIN sounds like it would explain the table's status or history, but it actually only shows query execution plans.
Community Discussion (6 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
The correct answer is B (No) because theEXPLAIN statement in Spark SQL is designed to display the logical and physical execution plans for a query. It does not provide any historical metadata about maintenance operations like OPTIMIZE or VACUUM that have been executed on the Delta table. Therefore, it cannot identify whether maintenance tasks were performed.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A (Yes) is incorrect because it assumesEXPLAIN reveals table maintenance history or status. To actually view the history of operations performed on a Delta table, the correct command is DESCRIBE HISTORY, not EXPLAIN. Relying on EXPLAIN would leave you without the necessary information to resolve the suspected maintenance issue.Community Comment Notes
As user 282b85d noted, "The EXPLAIN statement in Spark SQL is used to display the execution plan of a query... it does not provide historical information about maintenance tasks". Furthermore, user XiltroX correctly pointed out that the appropriate command to meet the goal is "DESCRIBE HISTORY customer".Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Know the specific Spark SQL and Delta Lake utility commands used for diagnostics and maintenance. EXPLAIN is strictly for query plans, while DESCRIBE HISTORY is for Delta table operation logs. Memorizing these distinct command purposes prevents confusion on the exam.
Related Analysis
Practice All DP-600 Questions
Access 115 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full DP-600 Practice Test →