DynamoDB Scheduled Auto Scaling for Predictable Workloads
Short answer
C Use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times.
Question
Key Takeaways
The exam tests the distinction between reactive auto scaling and proactive scheduled scaling, highlighting that scheduled policies are optimal for known, recurring peaks like Monday mornings.
This question evaluates the cost-effective management of Amazon DynamoDB provisioned capacity using AWS Application Auto Scaling with scheduled policies to match predictable traffic patterns.
Common mistake: Many learners choose On-Demand mode (D) because it handles variable load automatically, but this is incorrect for predictable workloads where provisioned capacity is significantly cheaper.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
AWS Application Auto Scaling allows you to configure target tracking or simple scaling policies based on schedules. Since the workload has a predictable pattern (Monday morning peak, low weekend usage), scheduling higher provisioned capacity during specific times ensures performance while avoiding the high costs of maintaining maximum capacity all week. This aligns perfectly with the requirement for the "MOST cost-effective way".
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A is inefficient because paying for peak capacity 24/7 results in significant waste during low-usage periods. Option B adds operational complexity without guaranteeing cost savings and may lead to uneven load distribution issues. Option D (On-Demand) is designed for unpredictable traffic; for predictable workloads, the per-request cost of On-Demand is generally higher than scaled-down provisioned capacity.
Community Comment Notes
Community consensus strongly favors C. User rralucard_ noted that option C "allows the company to align their DynamoDB capacity costs with actual usage patterns." User Christina666 correctly pointed out that "On-demand mode is great for unpredictable workloads" and would likely cost more here. User sdas1 referenced documentation stating "provisioned capacity is probably best for you if you have relatively predictable application traffic," reinforcing the choice of C over D.
Official Reference
- https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/AutoScaling.html
- https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/application/userguide/services-that-can-integrate-dynamodb.html
These links open the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
Always look for keywords like 'predictable' and 'cost-effective' when choosing between Provisioned and On-Demand modes. If the pattern is regular (e.g., daily, weekly), Scheduled Auto Scaling is usually the intended answer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why not use On-Demand mode for this scenario?
Does Scheduled Auto Scaling require manual intervention?
Community Votes
100% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 9 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 9
-
rralucard_ 👍 5 Answered COption C, using AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times, is the most cost-effective solution for the described scenario. It allows the company to align their DynamoDB capacity costs with actual usage patterns, scaling up only when needed and scaling down during low-usage periods.
-
pypelyncar 👍 4 Answered Capp autoscalling allows you to dynamically adjust provisioned capacity based on usage patterns. You only pay for the capacity you utilize, reducing costs compared to keeping a high, fixed capacity throughout the week
-
Christina666 👍 3 Answered CD. Change the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand... On-demand mode is great for unpredictable workloads. In your case, with predictable patterns, you'd likely pay more with on-demand than with a well-managed, scheduled, provisioned mode.
-
FuriouZ 👍 3 Answered CObviously better than B because of peak scaling
-
damaldon 👍 2C. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/application/userguide/services-that-can-integrate-dynamodb.html
Show 4 more comments
-
jpmadan 👍 1 Answered BD Excerpts from documentation: This means that provisioned capacity is probably best for you if you have relatively predictable application traffic, run applications whose traffic is consistent, and ramps up or down gradually. Whereas on-demand capacity mode is probably best when you have new tables with unknown workloads, unpredictable application traffic and also if you only want to pay exactly for what you use. The on-demand pricing model is ideal for bursty, new, or unpredictable workloads whose traffic can spike in seconds or minutes, and when under-provisioned capacity would impact the user experience. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/serverless-applications-lens/capacity.html
-
sdas1 👍 1C https://docs.aws.amazon.com/wellarchitected/latest/serverless-applications-lens/capacity.html DynamoDB auto scaling modifies provisioned throughput settings only when the actual workload stays elevated or depressed for a sustained period of several minutes. This means that provisioned capacity is probably best for you if you have relatively predictable application traffic, run applications whose traffic is consistent, and ramps up or down gradually.
-
Rakiko 👍 1 Answered CMy guess is C as it stands for Cat
-
lucas_rfsb 👍 1 Answered DAs I understand, should be D
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All DEA-C01 Questions
Access 100 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full DEA-C01 Practice Test →