Why Test a Modified Disaster Recovery Plan?
An organization has modified its disaster recovery plan (DRP) to reflect recent changes in its IT environment. Which of the following is the PRIMARY reason to test the new plan?
Community Votes
50% of anonymous learners picked answer D. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
This question tests the priority of DRP validation over staff training, with the common trap being the assumption that hands-on practice is the main goal of initial testing.
Testing a modified disaster recovery plan primarily validates its completeness and real-world effectiveness before personnel training begins. Community consensus emphasizes that verifying the plan’s technical and procedural accuracy must precede staff familiarization to avoid practicing flawed procedures.
Option D is frequently chosen because practitioners naturally associate testing with hands-on training; however, ISACA prioritizes verifying the plan’s technical and procedural integrity first, making training a secondary benefit rather than the primary objective.
Community Discussion (4 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Testing a revised DRP fundamentally serves to validate that updated controls, dependencies, and recovery steps function as designed. Without confirming the plan’s technical soundness, any subsequent execution during an actual outage risks systemic failure. CRISC methodology dictates that plan validation always precedes operational readiness activities like drills or training.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A focuses on asset identification, which belongs to the Business Impact Analysis phase, not post-modification testing. Option B relates to risk assessment validation, which occurs during initial planning, not after environmental changes. Option D highlights staff training, which is a valuable byproduct of testing but not the primary driver; ISACA consistently ranks plan validation above personnel familiarization in this sequence.Community Comment Notes
Multiple users correctly identified C, noting that “if the plan is flawed, no amount of training will help” [Comment 1]. Others clarified that testing ensures the DRP “addresses all critical systems, processes, and dependencies” after environmental changes [Comment 2]. While some defended D based on practical experience, the prevailing exam logic aligns with validating the plan’s comprehensiveness first before focusing on human execution.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
Always prioritize process validation over personnel actions when ISACA questions ask for the “primary” reason to test or implement a control. Look for keywords like “validate,” “verify,” or “comprehensive” before selecting training or awareness options.
Related Analysis
Practice All CRISC Questions
Access 332 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CRISC Practice Test →