Primary Preventive Method for Privileged Account Risks
Short answer
C Provide privileged account access only to users who need it to enforce least privilege as a primary preventive control.
Question
Key Takeaways
The question distinguishes between preventive and detective controls, trapping candidates who confuse periodic access reviews with proactive risk mitigation.
This CISM question tests the application of least privilege as the primary preventive control for privileged access management. Community consensus strongly favors restricting access based on business need over periodic reviews or monitoring.
Common mistake: Option B (periodic certification) is frequently chosen because it sounds compliant, but it functions as a detective or corrective measure rather than a preventive control.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Implementing the principle of least privilege directly prevents unauthorized access before it occurs, making it the strongest preventive control for privileged accounts. By granting elevated permissions only to users who explicitly require them for their job functions, organizations inherently reduce the attack surface and potential insider threats. This aligns with ISACA’s guidance that prevention must precede detection in security control frameworks.
Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Eliminating privileged accounts entirely is operationally impossible since system administration and critical business processes require elevated rights. Periodic access certification serves as a detective or administrative control that identifies existing risks after they have been established. Continuous activity monitoring provides real-time visibility but acts as a detective control rather than preventing the initial authorization or misuse.
Community Comment Notes
Multiple high-voted comments correctly identify least privilege as a fundamental security principle that must be applied proactively. Users note that option B resembles corrective or detective measures, which explains the vote split between B and C. The consensus reinforces that preventive strategies should focus on access justification rather than retrospective validation.
Official Reference
This link opens the official vendor documentation in a new tab.
Exam Strategy
Always classify controls by their timing—preventive stops incidents before they happen, while detective and corrective controls respond after the fact. When options include both access restriction and auditing mechanisms, prioritize the restriction for prevention-focused questions.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is periodic access certification not preventive?
How does least privilege differ from monitoring?
Community Votes
67% of anonymous learners picked answer C. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Discussion 5 contributions
Compiled from public community threads and reader submissions, lightly edited for clarity. Handles and vote tallies are shown as recorded, and comments reflect the views of individual contributors.
From public community threads 5
-
Josef4CISM 👍 2 Answered CNeed to know / least privilege is a fundamental security principle that needs to be followed.
-
ravikisan 👍 1 Answered BPeriodic assessment is important... over a period user roles change and access to be changed accordingly...
-
mdmdmd 👍 1 Answered CPrinciple of least privilege... option B sounds like corrective or detective
-
ServerBrain 👍 1 Answered CC. Provide privileged account access only to users who need it.
-
ravikisan 👍 1 Answered BPeriodic assessment is important
Reader comments & corrections
No reader corrections yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISM Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISM Practice Test →