What Is Most Important When Reviewing an Incident Response Plan?
Which of the following is MOST important for the information security manager to confirm when reviewing an incident response plan?
Community Votes
64% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests strategic alignment of security initiatives with business priorities; the common trap is selecting post-incident reviews for continuous improvement over foundational business impact assessment.
CISM candidates frequently debate whether continuous improvement or business alignment drives incident response planning. Community consensus and ISACA guidelines confirm that anchoring the plan to a Business Impact Analysis (BIA) remains the highest priority.
Option A is frequently chosen because post-incident reviews drive continuous improvement, but CISM prioritizes business-aligned planning over tactical feedback loops when determining the single most important factor.
Community Discussion (5 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
An incident response plan must first identify which systems and processes are critical to organizational survival. A Business Impact Analysis (BIA) provides the necessary data on recovery time objectives, financial exposure, and operational dependencies. By confirming the plan is BIA-driven, the security manager ensures resources are allocated to protect what matters most to the business. This aligns perfectly with CISM’s core mandate to treat information security as a business enabler rather than a purely technical exercise.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Option A focuses on post-incident reviews, which are valuable for continuous improvement but secondary to establishing baseline business priorities. Option C addresses physical storage logistics, which are operational details that do not dictate strategic response effectiveness. Option D emphasizes auditor accessibility, which serves compliance auditing rather than actual incident mitigation. None of these alternatives establish the foundational business context required for effective crisis management.Community Comment Notes
Several learners initially favored post-incident reviews for their role in closing feedback loops, reflecting a common crossover confusion between tactical operations and management strategy. Comment [3] correctly highlights how BIA mapping prevents misaligned resource deployment during active crises. Comment [4] rightly notes that without continuous updates, plans degrade, yet ISACA explicitly ranks business impact assessment above iterative refinement in scenario-based questions. The vote distribution ultimately validated the business-first mindset expected at the management level.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When answering CISM scenario questions, always filter options through the lens of business value and risk prioritization. If two answers seem technically sound, choose the one that establishes strategic alignment or governance framework before selecting tactical implementation steps.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn't a post-incident review more important?
Post-incident reviews improve future responses, but CISM requires the initial plan to first address business-critical assets identified through a BIA.
How does BIA directly support incident response?
BIA defines Recovery Time Objectives and priority levels, ensuring responders tackle high-impact incidents before lower-priority ones.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISM Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISM Practice Test →