How to Keep a Business Continuity Plan Current?
Which of the following is the BEST way to ensure the business continuity plan (BCP) is current?
Community Votes
50% of anonymous learners picked answer B. Votes are pick records left by other test-takers — they are not the verified answer.
Community Insight
Tests understanding of BCP maintenance by contrasting proactive validation (testing) against reactive documentation updates (BIA edits), with the trap being the assumption that administrative reviews alone guarantee currency.
Maintaining an up-to-date Business Continuity Plan requires active validation rather than static documentation updates. While some debate BIA revisions, CISM experts and community consensus confirm that periodic testing is the most effective method to verify plan currency and operational readiness.
Option B (Update BIAs regularly) is frequently chosen because stakeholders assume financial and impact assessments automatically refresh the BCP, but BIAs only identify requirements without validating whether actual recovery procedures remain accurate or executable.
Community Discussion (5 comments)
Comments & Corrections
No comments yet — spotted an error or have a note? Share it below.
Expert Analysis
Why the Answer Is Correct
Periodic testing directly exposes outdated contacts, obsolete recovery steps, and changed business dependencies. ISACA’s CISM review manual emphasizes that testing is the only reliable mechanism to validate that a BCP functions as intended and reflects the current operational environment. Each exercise forces cross-functional verification, making it the definitive safeguard against plan stagnation.Why the Other Options Are Wrong
Managing business process changes and reviewing emergency contacts are necessary maintenance tasks but are too narrow to guarantee overall plan currency. Updating BIAs captures evolving risk exposures and critical processes, yet it does not test whether the documented recovery strategies can actually be executed under pressure. Without validation through drills, these administrative updates remain theoretical and may miss practical execution gaps.Community Comment Notes
The voting split between options B and D highlights ongoing confusion between documentation updates versus validation exercises. Commenters supporting D correctly note that testing identifies weaknesses, verifies component alignment, and confirms staff familiarity during disruptions. Those favoring B argue that BIA updates are foundational, but experienced candidates clarify that BIAs inform strategy while testing proves its real-world applicability.Official Reference
Exam Strategy
When asked how to keep a plan current or effective, prioritize validation activities like testing, auditing, or exercising over routine documentation reviews. ISACA consistently rewards answers that demonstrate real-world verification rather than theoretical compliance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why isn't updating the BIA the best way to keep the BCP current?
BIAs identify critical processes and impacts but do not validate whether recovery steps are still accurate or executable. Testing actively verifies procedures against the live environment.
Does periodic testing replace routine BCP reviews?
No. Routine reviews handle administrative updates like contact lists, while testing validates end-to-end functionality. Both are required, but testing is superior for confirming actual currency.
Related Analysis
Practice All CISM Questions
Access 400 questions with complete answers and detailed explanations.
View Full CISM Practice Test →